Skip to main content

Hello all,

Here is a bad crash rebuilt several years ago. The picture posted below was the first email shot I received when they asked if it could be rebuilt. I said "sure I can rebuild it" all the while they were probably thinking "pucker up butter cup" Anyway it was a chore but came out quite well.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_6510
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

This is a picture of the lower frame rail outer skins with both of the inner structures drilled off. I rebuilt the suspension mount sleeves using 1" washers on both sides welded to the sleeve. This will prevent the sleeve welds from fracturing off the skins which all late model cars are prone to.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_(1)
This one was close to a total for sure.

This next picture is a better view of the removed damage showing the right rear wheel well fixture mounted to the car. I have a fixture system that bolts to a heavy frame spit platform that locates every stud or nut welded to the body. Using our fixture we can replace all of the damage assuring a correct part position. Using the fixture system, AmeriSport could build a Pantera from scratch if all the original metal parts were still available. It has proven to be invaluable when we're rebuilding sever crashes or bad rust damage.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_081
Freshly mounted quarter panel and deck lid. The deck was mashed badly on the right side where the impact originated. I had to remove the inner structure to straighten the skin and then re-weld the inner frame-work. The deck came out quite well considering the extent of damage.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_493
OK...gotta jump on the band wagon. Big Grin
Very impressive resurrection Kirk! Really fantastic metal work...!

BTW....don't think for a minute the process steps are boring. They eye candy is great, but the steps/details are the critical process to get there.
quote:
Thought I would post a shot of the finished car just before the transport picked it up. The rebuild shots can be a bit boring but critical to proving the car was rebuilt with the proper care and detail.
It really came out fantastic. It is somewhat comforting to know that all things are not necessarily lost.

Personally though from previous experience I am always concerned about the new longevity of the sheetmetal on cars like this.

I personally have seen very short life cycles on the sheetmetal that has been heated, shrunk and pounded out?

That metal doesn't seem to have great longevity once put back into service?

I noticed the primer that was mentioned and it definitely will be on my list for next time. Sure hope it does the trick?

Thank you for the photographic journey. I really enjoyed it a lot. Big Grin
Thank you all for the kind words and support.

quote:
Originally posted by PanteraDoug:
I personally have seen very short life cycles on the sheetmetal that has been heated, shrunk and pounded out?

That metal doesn't seem to have great longevity once put back into service?

I noticed the primer that was mentioned and it definitely will be on my list for next time. Sure hope it does the trick?
Big Grin


Working bent sheet metal properly takes patients and a light hand with the hammer. Also if you are shrinking with what I call "big heat" or a torch, that will suck the life right out of the tin. I use a shrink disk which heats the top surface on the sheet metal to pull it back. It's a slow process. Second when you are growing a low area or dent, the metal grows to the hammer so you start dolling around the outside of the low spot and hammer O-SO-LIGHTLY working you way into the center. This takes time and often a re-shrink using the disk. If you follow this method, the metal will be fine and have a long the happy new life cycle until the next crash.

Here is a view of the shell being moved to my paint booth area. It's in Rust Defender polyester primer and is ready to be blocked. I layer the car with 2 colors of material so you can clearly see the surface changes during blocking. Sometimes I use tint to change the layer colors and sometimes I use an actual color change---beige to gray---so on. This was a layer color change. Polyester is much harder to sand than urethane primer but it will not shrink in time and holds the top coat polish from shrinking much better---from what I have seen over many years of painting.

I painted my first full vehicle in high school---1974---it was a van in lacquer with multy-colored custom paint including my first attempt at mural painting---a vision to some---nightmare to others.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_942
Another view shows our modular caster wheel system. All of the cross bars slip into sleeves that lock down using simple 3/8 nuts welded to the sleeves and bolts tightened onto the crass bar. The caster lock on the same way I have many sizes of casters---some for a rough surface (pictured), smooth caster for the floor, and large wheel/tire combo for the rear if you need to move the entire frame fixture to another location.

The body has also been guide coated which is the darker shades you see on the top beige color primer.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_943
Thank you all once again for your kind words. There are many very talented hobbyist and professionals on the forum and I'm happy to among such a great group.

Next shot is the car blocked. I start with 180 dry---re-guide coat with 500% thinned color and wet block with 320---re-guide coat and finish wet sand with 500. The 180/240 dry block cut the surface straight but you have to be very careful on the next 2 steps making sure all of the dry sanded surface get re-sanded with the finer paper or your color will print scratches.

I have spent a lot of time in the booth---way back in my very early days the local dealerships would bring me their hard to match metallics for color blending---helped pay for my first Pantera.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_1052
Just a mostly hidden detail after the finish sanding and buffing was completed. We step sand the clear starting with 500 to 600, moving on to 1200 and finishing with 2000. If some of the coarser scratches get missed, the area is re-sanded with 2500 during the final buff---lots of work.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_1126
Next step was to re-finish the undercarriage with paintable undercoat and black semi black epoxy. This view show a bit of the passenger rebuild and the inside of the repaired left quarter panel in the gas-tank area. I was a chore to blend the textures that remained on the car into the smother new fabricated wheel well materials in an effort to make them match and not appear to have been re-done. I often had to make the undercoat rougher than the equipment would spray the material by using a dabber brush for applying wall paper glue---what a mess but it worked quite well. Kida like antiquing the underside---happens naturally with age but that's another issue.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_1123
Fantastic work and dedication to quality Kirk.

As the southern evangelist might say, "brothers and sisters I feel your pain".

I had quite a misplaced youth myself. I worked hard on as much stuff as I could missing virtually ALL of the sex, drugs and rock & roll of the times. Now I know too much and no one will give me work because they think I deserve to work only for top dollar! That makes me unimployable now. roll on floor

Maybe the Devil is right? Anyone know a hot looking drunken rock n'roll slut? This is too much work for me for bottom dollar? Smiler


I sure appreciate your work and sharing the pictures.

Now I know I can send the car to you when they bring it to me and want it fixed and it looks impossible to do at any price. Big Grin
Posted my thank you to Wayne on the wrong header---sorry for pulling his old thread up. I am showing my lack of computer suaveness along side the obvious poor typing and proof reading skills after reading some of my own posting. I'll try proofing a bit closer.

The wing project was interesting. The original wing was so poorly constructed and already had multiple repairs that were poorly done, I decided to build him a new one.

This is an exact replica of the original shape including the trailing edge which is always much thicker on every alternative wing available. The AmeriSport replica is much lighter than the original unit, uses composite end caps that are the correct shape and thickness, and is manufactured in one piece rather than bonded dry which add weight and make the wing much weaker. The picture shows the freshly mounted center section less end caps.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_1166
Here's a shot of the un-finished trailing edge with 1/8 tape on it and in the hand. The edge was actually thinner that the tape and matched the folded aluminum original exact. It was difficult to find a way to produce an edge this thin with the necessary strength needed to hold up but we found a solution.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_1168
quote:
Originally posted by PanteraDoug:
How do you rust proof inside of the channels that you had to make and weld into place? Shouldn't those have been pre-coated with something? Maybe galvanized?


Most of the pre-made fitted parts that were plug welded were first internally coated. When we do a full body reconstruction car, I have them E-coated when possible. Besides these option, I've made several different internal spray tips on flex hoses that spray 360 degrees. Also all of the seams are sealed from the outside before undercoating, painting, or texturing. If you looked at the wheel-well leg rebuild shots, you can see the pre-coated internal areas and box sections are removed, the car is positioned up-side-down to spray inside the opened cavities if the access is large enough. I have used galvanized in the past but the zinc make the welds difficult unless your running very precise spot-welding equipment. Hope this helps enplane the protection questions. I do not have pictures of the process but next time we internally seal, I'll get some shots to show everyone. Thanks for the questions---they help with getting better info for all to utilize if a similar situation come up on other cars under restoration.
quote:
Originally posted by Johnny Woods:
Bloody hell! Amazing work Kirk. I Love the fixture too. Thanks for sharing, I know it takes ages sorting through all the pictures and adding words but it's always worth it.

Johnny


Thanks Johnny---miss you my friend---we need to get together. What are you working on now? To dam bad we are not closer---I would dearly love to build something with you. Please
stay in touch---let's talk this Spring.

Moving on the customer decided to have the suspension freshened up so we did the gray Imron finish and replaced or re-plated all of the hardware. Here's a shot of some finished suspension parts before assembly.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_1226
This shot shows one of the items we installed on all of the AmeriSport assembled GT5-S cars to help protect the rubber motor mounts from radiant header heat. It's a simple piece of bent aluminum but was quite effective is saving the rubber from the excessive header heat.

Looking forward to any questions---I will go through the engine details later on.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_1572
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Slightlycrispy:
Kirk,

A few questions:

1. Are there differences between the GT5-S bodied chassis and the Ford-era chassis? Can you use the same jig for both in other words?

Yes there are many differences. The late model cars 9000 vin and up I think were hand built in a similar fashion to very early 71 cars. Frankly the full production version is stronger and stiffer. Reasons for this range from sheet metal that has been stressed stamped into a shape over hand broke flat stock to integrated internal structures to stiffen and spread load over off the shelf materials like tubing to build bolt sleeves into the frame for the rear A-arm mounts. The late model cars are fantastic for how they were built---just apples and oranges to use a cliché. I look at it this way---if you own a Pantera no mater what year, enjoy it---nothing else matters.

2. Do you paint your motor mounts with a high temp paint?

No need---never have had a problem with paint blistering from heat on the mounts---just the rubber decaying for heat.

3. Does the catalytic converter/muffler restrict the exhaust appreciably and/or does it quiet the car down at all?

I tested my original cat mufflers we made in-house and used on the GT5-S cars against all of the mufflers that were available at that time----6 or 7 years ago and the cats made the best HP out of every muffler. The back pressure at full throttle was just over 1 pound and sounded great. BUT can you use this type of muffler on a 750 Holley carbed 393 stroker with a massive roller cam, Parker funnel web--so-so-so NO! You will cook them quite fast. They work quite well when you keeping the air fuel ratio close to 14.7 or at least in the 14 range.

Off to see Lone Survivor
Kirk
I am amazed at the artristry and have studied the photo's in hopes to learn the details of putting mione together.

I have a question on the second photo going back that shows the location of the coil/MSD/solenoid. Just to the right of the solenoid is a straight pipe-like object I can't identify. what is that? (coolant expansion tank overflow?)

Also, is that photo taken through the removed rear quarter gill?

Joe
Last edited by jfb05177
quote:
Originally posted by Kirk Evans:
Here's the ignition control sub assembly with the MSD box mounted in a more appropriate location---IMHO


The Pantera-Electronics controller is the same dimension as the MSD. It has many additional features to the MSD, including...it doesn't require a tach adapter and it works ALL of the time. Wink
Just to the right of the solenoid is a straight pipe-like object I can't identify. what is that? (coolant expansion tank overflow?)

I do not remember, sorry.

Also, is that photo taken through the removed rear quarter gill?

No through the wheel opening with the shieldout.

The Pantera-Electronics controller is the same dimension as the MSD. It has many additional features to the MSD, including...it doesn't require a tach adapter and it works ALL of the time.

This car was finished 3 years ago and I do not believe Jon had his system available---and the customer already had the MSD. I personally have never experienced a MSD failure but have modified several cars to run the MSD only under boost or as needed manually so the radio worker better. Bother car requires 2 separate control systems--one ran a Dura spark and one ran a standard unilite. The Dura advantage was it retarded the ignition during starting.

Pantera-Electronics is the real-deal making fantastic items to improve the car. I have not ran the ignition control module but if it's like everything else Jon makes, it will be first class.
No worries---here is a crashed Italian from several years ago with a ton of damaged front end parts including ABS controls, the complete AC evaporator and heater box with blower. Many other frontal items required replacing or repairs not including the sheet metal. It took a hard front end hit.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • General_pictures_(5)
Here we are all most ready for the new sheet-metal and fiberglass internals. One thing that was incredible---when I started installing the new front end, all of the rivet holes on the internal fiberglass shrouding lined up the frame---and I mean all of them. It didn't even require pressure to install the 1/8" rivets from the fiberglass to the sheet-metal---I've drilled mounting holes using the part to be mounted and they have not lined up that good. A big salute to Ferrari on this one.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • General_pictures_(6)
Nose on--the customer did his own painting which we often do for people on reconstruction jobs---rust of collision. The lines on the fender helped me check the metal shaping on the left fender which was slightly damaged on the new front clip. We were very lucky to find another very late 328 that was smoked on the left rear. I bought the whole car and was going to build a toy targa 288 wan-na-be.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • General_pictures_(7)
quote:
Originally posted by Chris Wilson:
Fantastic work Kirk. Sexy colour, what is it,
it's what i was hoping for 13 yrs ago and ended up with a very plain red. love it.


Sorry Chris for the late response--missed your request. The color is stock GT5-s red which is quite orange. The picture looks good because it was shot late on an overcast day. The best time to shoot red is right before the son comes up in the morning. The UV angle makes the red really pop.

Here is the same color shot around noon on a hazy day. It's a very old 35mm picture that was scanned so the quality is not so good but you can see color difference.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 89_proto-type
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Belgiumbarry:
must be color of mine ? Smiler

Belgiumbarry,

Yes it appears to be the same color---hard to tell with pictures and various types of light.

What is the history of your car? Do you know it? It has a few AmeriSport details on it. Just curious.

Found a good frontend picture of the rebuild---still wet in this shot.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • pht100_(15)
Found a few more picture in another folder. This one may be of interest to S-owners. I've plated the spoiler bottoms on 3 S cars and it seems to be a big plus in keeping the lip straight. I used a much thicker that normal plate---125 thousands or 1/8" material and skinned the entire bottom. 2 of the owners have reported back that they have bottomed out with no visible damage to the spoiler---just some underside scrapes. It made a huge difference to the overall strength allowing the car to lift up rather that role the lip under and damage the spoiler top from material stretch.

Thought this may a plus for you GT5-S owners if you're repainting in the future.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_492
quote:
Originally posted by Kirk Evans:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Belgiumbarry:
must be color of mine ? Smiler

Belgiumbarry,

Yes it appears to be the same color---hard to tell with pictures and various types of light.

What is the history of your car? Do you know it? It has a few AmeriSport details on it. Just curious.

Found a good frontend picture of the rebuild---still wet in this shot.


thanks for interest ! #9425 is in the PROVAMO register. Was imported '86 by Carroll Shelby and bought back by a Belgium collector . I bought the car from him as he found the same , but a targa .... Smiler

wing pic , and indeed the orange in the red

quote:
Originally posted by Kirk Evans:
What engine is in your car? Cleveland or Windsor? Are the door tags from the US still on it? I have history with your car but can't remember the details---28 years ago.


Hi Kirk ,

indeed.. i found in the car's documents that the car was send to Auto Exotica by Shelby Automotive for smog equiqment ( all removed now ) and this was confirmed (???? ) by Kirk Evans, pre Amerisport . Smiler

Documents :Original engine , Aussie black block 351C , suspect 2V heads

Door tag indeed.. i will take a pic and post it here

greetings
Norbert
quote:
Originally posted by Bdkity:
Hi Kirk, like many of the others, I'm in awe of the commitment and skill required to bring this car back. How many hours of labor from start to finish? Thanks for sharing.
Be well,
-Olaf


Olaf,

Thank you so much for the kind kudos. On a project like this when the insurance company is involved and the car is much worse than originally estimated, I do not track the hours accurately but I am sure there are 500 man hours or more in it. The actual sheet-metal collision work on this car was not that bad. Details, un-seen rust, improvements, paint requiring a total teardown (which is the only way I will repaint any car), customer changes and the haunting perfectionist in me causes far more issues with increased man-hours that the bump work. Sorry for tooting my own horn---you will always get more than the hours reflect because it is impossible to explain why a simple looking bracket took maybe 4 hours to scratch build could cost 400.00---so often we choose to eat the time. I prefer to have extremely happy customers with a car that is well built, run tested so when you are taking your mate out to the neighborhood eatery, paid the check, both walk out to a crowd looking at the car, it looks, starts and runs perfectly. If the car fails because of a poorly made bracket, bad wiring connections or any number of poor craftsmanship issues from the work preformed, it is the worst, most embarrassing moment possible for the owner and I will not allow any car to leave in less than a 100% condition unless we are not completing the project top to bottom. I often do portions of cars so in that case only the work we've done is scrutinized. Sorry for the wordy explanation---but I thank you for asking. (:>)

One example---in the picture below there is allot going on in a tight area. One example---there are 5 relays that control 2 separate ignition control modules---a Ford Dura spark and a MSD multi spark. The customer can switch from system to system on the move and there is a reason for this option. This car's 393 engine was dynode making 565 HP and is driven short jaunts during the season and has never had a failure since it was delivered 5 years ago. Every connection is shrink tubed and properly routed so the wires will not rub through non grommet-ed holes or burn from radiant exhaust heat.

Hope the explanation helps. Thank you all again for the kind words of support.

Kirk

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_2156
quote:
Originally posted by Kid:
Always great to see the work of a skilled someone, regardless of the skill Cool

I whole heartedly agree 100%. There is a combined skill set on this forum that could compete with the best worldwide. I'm here to learn and hopping to help.

I did spot other than the typical bushings sold by many vendors in the suspension arms. What kind are the ones you used in this car Kirk?


The fronts are MAP's in Florida and the rears were in the car and the customer did not want to change them. I think they are originally from Hall---red urethane with center sleeves. I would not have re-installed them if they were the first design without sleeves. The urethane was still good--a bit softer than I prefer but OK to use. IMHO
Hi Kirk ,

indeed.. i found in the car's documents that the car was send to Auto Exotica by Shelby Automotive for smog equiqment ( all removed now ) and this was confirmed (???? ) by Kirk Evans, pre Amerisport . Smiler (quote)



The smog info car was Carroll's GTS converted in 85 right after Carlini's GT5 and we were just starting the GT5-S assembly program with 9381. The GTS was later converted into a turbo charged Chrysler powered BEAST!. I think I've told the ride story his driver gave me on there 1/8 mile test track in California ---OMG--- I had my own twin turbo test Pantera there and on the track which was quite 935 turbo Porsche fast but no where near the GTS Chrysler turbo warp 9 fast.



Your car has far more history with AmeriSport inc. In those early days I made many trips to DC getting educated to properly file all of the necessary documents needed to be an automobile manufacture in the US or A.



Maybe I should tell some of the fun and not so fun stories of those days---where would I post something like this George? You don't have a "OMG what was I thinking" or maybe "days of grandeur" category. We all could post on those.

AAAAAAA memory lane. Lot's of stories about those years and what might have been.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Picture_2461
Thank you LS.---The owner is a great guy.

OK Rapid, here's a bit of history that has not been told.

In 1987, we started designing a new look for the car. We did a dozen or so paper sketches several of which I took to the factory to show them. The jest of showing them the concept art was always OMG! don't let Mr. Detomaso see those---he will get very angry. My question back was always Why?---there was allot more said. All I can say today is the people who were working the factory in those days were fantastic and very supportive of the AmeriSport project and my efforts personally.

During this time, the factory, through there primary trim company, was working on a totally new interior design. They showed me the results which were not so good so I asked them to please let me work on the inside so I could develop a look that will compliment the final outside re-design.

We played with many designs in an effort to keep the original Pantera GT5-S feel but to hopefully make the car look like it belonged to the late 80s---which is easer said than done. Here is one of the early rendering concept sketches of the cars back end from that time period. I wanted a new wing look so we played with several designs---this was one which did not go anywhere.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Copy_of_Picture_2458
We were dealing with 2.5 MPH DOT crash requirements so the bumper had to have impact ability. The final design was never built but was about half of the size of the picture below--about 3" in additional length rather that the 6" The larger design was prototyped and installed on 3 cars. It did not have this side look---these are just to show everyone how many different looks we played with back in the day.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Copy_of_Picture_2457

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×