ttam23, I have Michelin Pilot Sport, 235/40 ZR 17 and 335/35 ZR 17 on a narrow body Pantera with a low stance. No rubbing issues except the rear part of the front inner fender when steering wheel is turned max. Fender lips are rolled, I don't know if the tires would rub if fender lips weren't rolled
I always find the side view of these cars interesting.
The clearance under the front radiator support always looks huge in the pictures.
On my car if I make a fist, if I hold it vertically, it will not clear. I have to turn it horizontally to clear.
Maybe I should check the size of my hands?
Not all these areas in all narrow-body Panteras will normally be needed, but they might- be ready. Our '72 L had all the above in contact. As a last mod, check very carefully the clearances between the flexible brake hoses and front tread edges; on some lowered, caster-increased Panteras, the right flex hose gets uncomfortably close or touches. Wearing through the rubber line could really spoil your day! And if you've replaced the stock lines with stainless steel, the tough ss line jacket will shave expensive rubber off the inner edge of the tire.
Running a max-width front tire as above frees up options for a larger width REAR tire along with decent handling. Running less than 9.5"-width fronts AND 335-width rears will INCREASE understeer that probably cannot be otherwise adjusted out with different swaybars or coil-over shocks. Or, you can go slow and handling issues will not show up. In back, selecting a 26-1/2"-26-3/4" OD tire will allow the stock speedo and odometer to work accurately.
Lots of things to consider when you attempt to improve on what Dallara gave us in 1970.
quote:Originally posted by Steeler:
I have 235/40x17 pilot's on the front of my narrow body - no rubbing here?
Are your fender lips folded?
quote:Originally posted by George P:
The front wheel well openings were rolled by the factory on the Pantera L, but not the earlier Panteras.
Mine are not rolled. It is #4460. 9/72 build date. '73L model.
I have the 15" Campis 8/10 on the car with P7 225-50-15 in front and 285-55-15 on the backs.
Talk about maxing out the wheel width on a tire? Yikes.
I do like in particular that tire on the fronts because with removing the spring spacer that tire lowers the front of the car noticeably without the car looking slammed.
The nose is down there with the go carts, so I don't think it is unfair or derogatory to call it an Italian go cart at all?
It's about 41 inches to the roof with the spring spacers out of there.
I am going to change out the rear tires though to the MT LT 26 x 12R15 tires.
I think they are a better fit cosmetically to the rear and aren't as stressed out on the 10 inch rim as the P7 is.
I can't immagine that P7 on an 11" rim. Not arguing that the manufacturer isn't saying that it's ok or not.
I just know on the 10" rim vs. 285 relationship looks very precarious.
I also had bad experiences with BFG on maxing out the tire to the maximum recommended wheel width.
I had two tires split the treads and throw pieces of them off down to the belts on the carcass.
BFG refused to warranty them saying that it was a mis-application by me because it was not the RIM DESIGN WIDTH. Their chart clearly showed it was the maximum recommended width but they said that voided the warranty since it was more than the DESIGN width.
I can testify that maximing out the tire like that virtually eliminates any flex in the tire wall of the P7 which kind on makes me wonder why even bother with a radial back there at all. The fitment negates the value of the radial all together?
To me that is much more of what you would do on a race car rather than a street car, meaning there is NO play in the tire in the rear as a result...like a bias racing tire would be.
Voiding the warranty on a tire is a joke anyway. When it comes down to it you are buying a new tire because the warranty was based upon list price and a pro-rated number on it. No one pays list price on tires.
I have read this post multiple times and every time I get dizzy! I use to work with dimensions and rattling off reams of figures was the norm, but nothing as boggling as this.
I think I have begun to grasp the concept of wheel offsets, tire widths and possibility of scrubbing, but I just wanted to verify the few basics, please correct me if I am wrong
To me, offset is the value of a wheel I am interested in and to determine it, I can easily measure wheel width and backspace.
offset = backspace - wheel width/2.
The wheels bolt to the lug stud flanges and this width should be the starting point for any wheel evaluations. From online sources, I found the front track given as 57” with the OEM 7” Campy’s and their 0.25” offset. From this I gather the front flange to flange width would be 57.5”. Is this correct thinking?
Track = 57.5” - 2 X offset
Using the track and the tire sectional width, I can figure a tire outside width. For the OEM with 185s, that would be 64.3”.
Outside = Track + sectional/25.4
If correct in my thinking, I can use the flange width and the offset of the desired wheel to figure the new track. For example, in George’s post with the wheel table, he stated the 8” clone Campy’s had an offset of 0.86”, thus given a new track of 55.8”. With a 245 tire, one can expect rubs. This combo would have a width of 65.4” (or have the tire about 0.6” farther out than OEM combo). Going with the 9” clone and its 1” offset, the outside width would reduce to 65.1” and be OK.
My comparison of using the OEM 8” with their 0.75 offset reduces the track to 56” and with the OEM 225 tires had the outside width of only 64.9”.
So it appears to me that an outside tire width of less than 65.4” is the limit. I am still dreaming I’ll use the OEM wheels, but this implies that the BFGoodrich TA 215/60r15 93S for 7” I was considering might scrub with its outside width of 65.5”
(oh, I did make an excel sheet to do the crunching)
The problem with your calculation is, wheel width is defined as "the measurement from the inside of the outer tire bead lip to the inside of the inner bead lip. Your calculation would be "off" by 1/2". I'm sure what you meant by "wheel width" was the total distance across the wheel (outside edge to outside edge) but that requires someone to interpret what you meant by wheel width. The problem I have with the diagram above is, wheel width and rim width are interchangeable terms. You're always better off measuring wheels the way wheel manufacturers do.
Offset = (backspace minus 1/2") minus half of the wheel width, converted to millimeters. As an example, an OEM 15" x 8" campy has 5-1/4" backspacing. To convert the backspacing to offset, the equation is: (5-1/4" - 1/2") - 4" x 25.4 = 19mm (actually it's 19.05mm but offset is always rounded to the nearest mm).
The single most mis-understood aspect of wheel measurements (and there are many) is how to adjust your measurements for a tire bead lip that's less than 1/2" thick. For the purposes of calculating backspacing, you always assume your tire bead lip is 1/2" thick, even if it's not. That's the industry standard. As an example, If HRE made an 8" wheel for the front of a Pantera and used OEM backspacing specs (5-1/4" BS), the backspacing would actually measure 5" if you measured it with a tape measure, because HRE's "lips" are only 1/4" thick. The invoice would say 5-1/4" BS / 19mm offset however.
You can see where problems arise. If the person who purchased those HRE wheels didn't know about the 1/2" rule, he might tell his friend "my wheels are 8" wide on the front and I just measured the backspacing for you". "It's 5", so you should order the same because they're perfect"!
Originally posted by JFB #05177:
... I have read this post multiple times and every time I get dizzy! I use to work with dimensions and rattling off reams of figures was the norm, but nothing as boggling as this ...
I don't want your mind to be boggled.
There's a formula I use, when determining how far a tire's outer sidewall extends outwardly from the hub's wheel mounting surface:
(tire cross-section ÷ 2) - off-set (negative offsets are added)
The front tire's sidewall is flush with the fender's edge at approximately 126.5mm
The rear tire's sidewall is flush with the fender's edge at 150.5mm
I have 18"x12.5" rear wheels with 335/30-18 tires and height adjustable Koni gas shocks (from Pantera East) on my stock bodied Pantera. Initially I had a rubbing problem with the inside of the tire rubbing against the upper frame section. After installing an extra bump rubber, I have ZERO rubbing and the rear suspension feels no different than it did before.
Credit for this tip goes to Dennis Quella.
Thanks in advance.
quote:Originally posted by Garvino: Anyone have a side profile picture of a Pantera running 18" front and 19" rear wheels? Thanks in advance. Devin