Skip to main content

Reply to "Alberta Mountain Run"

Clearly the defendant is basing his defence on flimsy, under-funded counsel. Perhaps if he spent more of his funds on proper legal counsel instead of "octane boost" he would realize the insufficiency of his argument.

Our "reference" bug (a dragonfly) is traveling at 36 mph, which is widely regarded as the upper limit of speed for airborne insects. Sufficient remains exist to verify its origin (should defence wish to validate our sample...). While Mr "H" can argue that the windshield was not attached to the vehicle, the prosecution will show that to be yet another false-hood, as his car is widely known to be "original" and "unaltered" (with the exception of the previously noted 4/8 cyl. engine).

Prosecution rests. Big Grin
×
×
×
×