Then any of the three WILL work.
There isn't any reason to question the cam manufacturers recommendations. You have chosen to take a different path with this type of cam selection so you need to go with their recommendations as the best solution.
There are unquestionably "pitfalls" out there in some of the details. I think of it as safest to stay with the simplest solution, with the longest known record of dependability.
That doesn't guaranty 100% dependability either. Just likely a better known long term result. Everything else is some kind of a risk and I ask myself, "is that an unnecessary risk?"
I still say, much of the decision is just plain "risk analysis". "You" are now the Doctor and you prescribe the solution.
When you stray away from the original stock then you may have different results and additional risks.
"You pay your money, and you take your chances". Maybe this is just, pick the "Lady or the tiger"?