Again, not the real George here...but it seems nobody else wants or can answer. so I try it.
My theoretical thoughts of your cam:
As a rule of thumb a single pattern cam like yours (intake duration = exhaust duration) is optimal for a head that does not differ more than 80-80% between intake and exhaust flow. (I have never seen flow numbers of OEM heads, that are at 85%, so I absolutely can't understand why e. g. compcams produces so many single pattern cams for all types of engines)
Because the original 4V heads are a perfect example of flow difference between intake and exhaust
(Chart by the real George ) 
https://pantera.infopop.cc/top...975#1598208419816975
At 0.500 lift for example the exhaust port flows less than 70% of the intake port.
That is why GeorgeP chooses these lobes with such big difference between intake and exhaust, to help the exhaust port.
In addition you have a tight LSA of 110°, this will cause reversion into the intake at low rpms.
If I would have to guess:
You will have a narrow rpm-band where your engine has "steam", how narrow depends on the rest of your engine. This doesn*t mean, that your car will be undriveable.
What GeorgeP tries to achieve is a broad torque curve like a stock cam but using modern lobes and more duration, but NOT using a tighter LSA. Perhaps you can look at it as stock+1.
If your car runs with that cam, please tell how it feels, and in what rpm band it drives best.
Edit:
After rereading my own post, I felt the need to add: "Sorry for my bad english!"