Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
and shed some weight while your at it.

Maybe, maybe not.

One motor vs. two motors. One drive mechanism vs. two drive mechanisms. Two new motor mountings, two new linkage systems vs. one cross bar. Looks like the pivot axles have been beefed up and true bearings added; good for operation, but heavier.

Would hope you will take weight of removed parts vs. installed parts. I applaud the creativity, but not sure you're saving weight and surely not making things any simpler.

Larry
quote:
Originally posted by LF - TP 2511:
quote:
and shed some weight while your at it.

Maybe, maybe not.

One motor vs. two motors. One drive mechanism vs. two drive mechanisms. Two new motor mountings, two new linkage systems vs. one cross bar. Looks like the pivot axles have been beefed up and true bearings added; good for operation, but heavier.

Would hope you will take weight of removed parts vs. installed parts. I applaud the creativity, but not sure you're saving weight and surely not making things any simpler.

Larry



Weight is about the same. It wasn't about making it harder or simpler. I wanted the bar gone and I wanted to do it this way.
Funny you should mention that. I was just playing witht he linkage tonight. The main idea is the motor would stop either fully up or fully down. By doing so if the motor malfunctioned it could not over rotate. If it did it would not hurt anything as it could move a full 360 degrees.

Second, with the motor stopping at apex a few degrees either way would not effect travel much.

Third I am going to alter the headlight bar lever arm to have a threaded rod where it to can be adjusted. Other wise the hole drilled has to be right on the money. And it will be easy to adjust travel as well as up and down limit.Here are a few photos of playing with it:


I wrote an article for PI about a year ago about a modification for the original motor lift. I fabricated aluminum stops for the buckets designed to stop against the rubber bubbers in the fender in the up position. This was to stop the bouncing bucket problem because of the rod arrangement. This also gave me repeatable up position as well.
I am curiuos about your arrangment the up position without stops. Remember the up position is critcal because the angle is greater at a distance where the light hits the road than at the pivot point in the fender.
I designed a motor control for the Pantera headlight system to complment the mechicanical changes, so if you need motor controls for your motors let me know I would glad to help. Nice job in fabrication and design!
Thanks, I am going to tackle the circuitry on my own; that's where the fun is. I am going to use limit switches on one side just to see how well it works but on the other side I am using a servo circuit witch will maintain position with pulse width. We'll see how well that works.

Gary


quote:
Originally posted by Jon3613:
I wrote an article for PI about a year ago about a modification for the original motor lift. I fabricated aluminum stops for the buckets designed to stop against the rubber bubbers in the fender in the up position. This was to stop the bouncing bucket problem because of the rod arrangement. This also gave me repeatable up position as well.
I am curiuos about your arrangment the up position without stops. Remember the up position is critcal because the angle is greater at a distance where the light hits the road than at the pivot point in the fender.
I designed a motor control for the Pantera headlight system to complment the mechicanical changes, so if you need motor controls for your motors let me know I would glad to help. Nice job in fabrication and design!
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×