Skip to main content

I am about to pull the radiator for a small leak repair on #4134.

What is the general consensus on the use of rubber vs. urethane on the radiator mounts ?

It seems that the venders are pushing urethane (which I am currently using). I would think the urethane being more rigid would not be as optimal as rubber and give a little more flex.
Thanks,
Jeff
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Jeff,

Over the years I have used both.

The Rubber mounts are more durable and are recommended from my point of view.

My latest experience is as follows: When I re-installed my Hall Phoenix Rad I had one bad rubber mount so I replaced that mount with a urethane one. I re-used the good rubbber mount. When I pulled the rad, I noticed that the Urethane mounts were not re-usable but the rubber one was still OK. The upper mounts (which were also urethane) needed to be replaced.

IMHO, go with the rubber !

HTH

B.G.
quote:
rubber vs. urethane on the radiator mounts ?

Rubber, with no doubt.

The rubber mounts are the only thing that help keep the body flex (these are Panteras, remember?) from being transmitted into the structure of the radiator. I just don't think any urethane, unless VERY soft, will do as well a job in this matter.

I JUST ordered new bottom and side rubber mounts from Wilkinson:

About $25 for the parts

About $12 for shipping.

Yea, maybe too much for 6 pieces of rubber. But in the overall scheme of things, what's $37 on a $45,000 car?

Larry
I am also running the Hall radiator. It is 10 + years old and was using rubber mounts.
After about 8 years it developed a tiny leak. Marino (PEast) recommended, no insisted that the poly was a better product for this application.
After 2 ½ years I now have another small leak. Were the stiff poly bushings a factor? Maybe? Maybe not? But I have ordered a set of rubber bushings from Wilkinson.
Thanks for the feedback.
Jeff
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×