Skip to main content

I recently purchased a set of high end adjustable billet coilover shock absorbers for my '74. The front end of my car is very tight, the previous owner having installed polyurethane A-Arm bushings and Zerk fittings. The rear bushings appear to be OEM and are in terrible shape. I'd like to install the shocks and re-hab the rear at the same time. My question: Polyurethane or the updated neoprene (sleeved both sides with neoprene sandwich)? Either way, I know it's a labor-intensive job. The anti-poly camp says the ride is much harsher, all shocks are transmitted directly to the frame, and there is a higher propensity for paint cracking; they also point to the squeaking (Zerk fittings or not). The "updated OEM" bushings are 3X the cost of the polyurethane, but claim to offer a tight, yet more compliant ride. The car is basically used as a weekend cruiser now, but I plan to do 2-3 track events per year.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I disagree- the ride on the several Panteras I've driven is not noticably harsher with all-polyurethane bushings. My '72L has had such everywhere for decades and my delicate wife regularly drive 6-8-hr stints with no problems; we also have stock (but rebuilt) seats. Paint cracking IMHO is also not dependent on bushings; it has much more to do with the loads being fed into the suspension from giant tires or aggressive driving. Perhaps people who add urethane suspension bushings tend to push harder? Dunno the answer to that.
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×