Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It depends what bolts you have. If they are modern replacement and Torque to Yield then the correct answer is they are single use as they are torqued beyond their spring back point and permanently stretched the first time you use them.

OEM bolts should be okay for reuse, but give them a thorough inspection, paying particular attention to any distress in the threads near where they would tighten in the block.

A couple of years ago I reinstalled the heads on my Euro Pantera with a new set of ARP head bolts after they had a valve job and the bolts worked great.  After that I had to pull the heads two more times to fix some problems.  During the last reinstall I could tell that the bolts are pretty much done and will get a new set of bolts if I have to pull the heads again.

I have done more then a few rebuilds in my time. The bolts that I have had the least issues with are the original equipment Ford supplied bolts.

If someone is in the situation of tearing down a lot, it is just logical to predict that something is going to get to the point that it should be considered worn out?

The flanged grade 8 head bolts that Ford originally used are at a level of, or better then the ARP's.

The amount of torque applied is not to a point where you need to measure bolt stretch. Much of that is going to be absorbed in the compression of the head gaskets used.

If you get to the point of stretching the bolts, then you had better start looking at stretching the block. For even a serious vintage road racer, that simply isn't a necessary consideration.

At this point, this discussion is simply an over reaction to "a little knowledge is dangerous".

The only way to be certain that a screw has not exceeded its elastic limit is to measure it as precisely as possible with a micrometer when it is new with an accuracy of a few hundredths of a mm, carefully note this length and check when it is dismantled again the length has not increased? Everything else is just speculation that has no place in a technical discussion.
Now, as almost no one does this (personally I only do it for connecting rod and crankshaft bearing screws), especially on a 50 years old car, I no longer take the risk of refitting screws which I don't know life to save less than $100. I did this on the first engines I rebuilt a long time ago when I was young, inexperienced and had little money........ until I destroyed an engine because of a screw that broke.


I am of course only talking about the main engine screws which support significant forces, not the screws which hold the oil pan or the cylinder head covers or.....


But everyone does as they want their knowledge, their experience and their means.

Last edited by rene4406

The threads in the block are often overlooked. Make sure that you run a tap through them, clean the threads on the bolts and use a thread assembly lube.

Studs can be difficult to use on a Pantera because of the difficulty of raising the head high enough to clear the top of the studs.

Ford used a special "Reintz" head gasket on the Boss 351 because of the additional torque used on the head bolts, but they are the same head bolts, not special ones..

Many of the Cleveland race engines that I have seen over the years and back in the day were using head studs, It certainly won't hurt to convert to them or use ARP bolts, but generally speaking the Ford head bolts have never had issues.

Using a tap, mine have always remained "snug".

In comparing clearances of known bolts, the numbers that I have seen on clearances is approximately .007" on hardware store, off the shelf bolts and .003" on ARP bolts. The ARP bolts therfore are made to better tolerances.

Good Ford bolts are around the ARP number. Maybe +.0005".

In any case you need to clean out the threads in the block. They will often have remnants of thread locker of some kind in the bore. How you do that is up to you.

You can always start checking od's on the taps. You for sure do not want to start repairing threads in the block.

Last edited by panteradoug
@marlinjack posted:

WRONG!!! Never run a Tap down Threaded Bores! No Two Taps cut the Same. A second Tap will remove MORE Metal and make the Threads LOOSER!!

To Clean the Threads out from debris, take a Sacrificial Bolt and Grind 'Teeth' Into the Nose, and use that to clean out the Bore and Threads. With a 'Different Tap', Once Loosened the Threads will Be Forever Sloppy! "Listen to Me Now, Or Believe Me Later".

...I used a 'Second' Tap to clean-out Block Threads, ONCE, Decades Ago, and Regretted It Ever Since! The Bores were 'Sloppy' Forever! Never Again! It was a 400 Pontiac.

If You havn't already 'RE-Tapped' the Threads...Take a Bolt, screw it down one inch and try to wiggle it, for Play. Tight? Great! Leave it that way! Clean it with a Bolt, Only. Bolts as Critical as 'Head-Bolts', You want them as Tight as Possible!!

MJ

...'Thinned' Threads are Weak Threads. And are More Prone to Stripping Out. You would Realize this, when You Torque Your BOSS Heads to 125 Ft/Lb!! Rip Them Right Out! That's why Most DIY'Rs Stop at 90!

P.S. Sorry Doug! NO Assembly 'Lube'. The Bolt will Rotate Too Easy and never Torque UP. You'll Keep Going and Strip the Threads. Sealant Only at the Bottom of the Bore. Bolts and Studs Install DRY! And My Heads Clear The Studs Just Fine...But I have The Arms for It, and 6'6" Leaning way in over the Fender. Just have to Move the Pressure Bottle. And Last, Remember...NO Belt Buckles, NO Zippers and NO Levi Rivets!! Even when using a Fender Blanket.

Completely agree with you about cleaning the threads, never a tap.

On the other hand, for lubrication, I would not be so categorical, it depends on how the tightening torque was determined by the manufacturer. ARP for example clearly specifies that the torques they indicate are to be applied with their super lubricant.

The objective of tightening is to apply a tensile force to the screw, an effort sufficient to obtain a solid assembly but corresponding to a stress lower than the elastic limit.

The torque corresponding to this effort was calculated as a function of the slope of the thread and the coefficient of friction between the threads.
If the coefficient of friction used takes into account lubrication and we do not lubricate, the force applied will be less than that desired and the assembly will not be sufficiently strong. Conversely, if dry tightening is planned and lubrication is used, the force will be greater than expected and risks exceeding the elastic limit.

There is therefore no general rule, you must follow the recommendations of the manufacturer who made the calculations.

I have never been lucky. I just knew what I was doing.

The variance on a bolt is going  to be more then on a tap. The Ford bolts are really very good. I have had more issues with ARP then the Ford although not enough to form a significant negative pattern.

We all learn from our own mistakes. With the amount of mistakes that I have made, I should be a genius by now and yet, I am not? It is a good thing that we share information. It comes from different experiences and shouldn't be arbitrarily dismissed?

I feel like we are a bunch of surgeons debating how to do the sutures?

You guys are funny!

I reuse the Toyota Head Bolts on my Land Cruiser.

I chase the threads by taking an old head bolt, and using a hacksaw to cut a slightly angled longitudinal groove across the threads.  The groove gives all the “gunk” a place to go as you run the “chaser” in and out.

Rocky

Last edited by rocky

You can make it as simple or as complicated as you want to.

It is REALLY  easy to match up the teeth on the bolts you are going to use with a tap or a chase.

What is more important is the differences in the bore in the block and the OD of the bolts. .007" difference from a hardware store bolt will wobble in the block bore. The Ford or the ARP won't. The clearance is tighter.

So you made a thread chaser? Good for you. Just get the gunk out of the bolt bores or someone will definitely get the gunk out of you.

Lets make this more complicated? Gee-se!

Last edited by panteradoug
@marlinjack posted:

...You are correct! ARP Recommended THEIR Lube be used UNDER the NUT (NOT on the Threads) as in the case of their Studs**. I presume a Drop of Lube under the BOLT Head wouldn't hurt. But, 'Assembly' Lube is for Camshafts and Rockers to Valves.

And, It's Not so much the Diameter of the Tap as it is...NO two Taps are EXACTLY* the Same, on the FLANKS of the TEETH! And There Exist, at Least, 3 Mechanical Types of Taps...Tapered Tap, Plug Tap, and a Bottom Tap. Which tap did FORD use? And which Tap Did You Use??

Use a 'Sharpened' Bolt, to Clean.

*Different Taps? You won't Know this until After you have Ruined Threads. Just in My Experience of Over 50 Years as a Master Machinist. I AM the Master of Threads! I AM the Master Splines. I AM the Master Of Tapers. If Your Bores remained 'Snug'...You were Damn Lucky!! Anybody Else?

** ARP also recommends THEIR studs be Installed 'Hand Tight' with the fingers...nothing More. With a Sealant on the Bottom few threads of the Stud, just in case the Bore gets Cracked into the Water Jacket. I Installed My Studs, with sealant using the 'Jam-Nut' Method, NO Lube On the Threads, A Few Drops Of ARP LUBE Under The NUT ONLY! I 'Snugged' The Studs in with a Very Light Pressure with a Wrench, just to Make sure they were 'In all the Way', and with the Greatest Respect to the Water Jacket! There is a 'Stud Installation' Tool...I Never Needed One. BOLTS Should always have a Sealant on the Bottom few Threads. I Never used a Lubricant on ARP Threads! The Torque is Proofed on the Fine Thread NUT, NOT the Studs Course Threads!! So why would You Lube Those? My Recommendation is, BOLTS INSTALL DRY!!

MJ

It's not for the pleasure of contradicting you but if you are right about the threads of the stud which are mounted in the block dry or with a sealant, the ARP instructions are however very clear, it is necessary to lubricate the threads of the screws and those of the part of the studs where the nut comes.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
Last edited by rene4406

These instructions are the ones that accompanied the bolts and studs that I purchased for my 351 Cleveland.
Look closely, there are two instructions, the first for the main studs and the second for the  head bolts, the ones we are talking about.


Sorry Marlinjack, you are very very often right but not always and here, it's you who should be upset because it's you who is contradicted by ARP.

To end the class it is necessary to add that the main interest of studs is not to add a torsional stress to that of traction and for this it is necessary to reduce as much as possible the friction between the threads of the stud and the nut, hence the importance of lubrication.

Last edited by rene4406

I think there is confusion caused by Ford originally using two different head gaskets.

Only the original Boss head gasket requires high torque readings. Current replacements such as the Felpro do not and are not prone to leaking at the lower torque numbers. Even though that BOSS gasket is now rarely used, the torque numbers remain posted as "Gospel", of which they are not.

Don't fight an unnecessary battle. It is only the original Boss Reintz gasket that needs super high numbers and that is only because of the high compression ratio. It was a more reliable gasket for extreme racing use durability but completely not necessary unless you WERE a serious racer in the 1970's. There are now better alternatives developed since.

Last edited by panteradoug

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×