Skip to main content

I have 4v heads and bought chevy springs and spacers . This was suggestet by an verry nice engine build thread here in the forum.
The problem is now : should the spring spacer sitt flat on the bottom of the head ? This means we have to mill some material from the place where the oem spring is located ? Thanks a lot for your help!
Last edited {1}
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

you'd want any dead weight under the spring where it doesn't move, otherwise the spring needs to control that weight for no good reason

machining spring seat pads for alternate springs is common. if there's not enough material around the remaining perimeter you can use a locator cup to center on the outside diameter of the valve guide to hold the base of the spacer/spring in place. addition material equal to the thickness of the locator cup will also need to be removed to achieve correct valve spring installed height/pressure
The 351C is equipped with a “big block” style valve train, meaning large (heavy) valves, large (1.5” diameter) valve springs, high ratio rocker arms, sturdy push rods, and sturdy (thick walled) tappets. Valve springs for flat tappet camshaft applications should have 115 to 130 pounds seated force and 300 to 330 pounds force at maximum lift (over-the-nose). Valve springs for roller tappet camshaft applications should have 150 to 160 pounds seated force and 370 to 400 pounds force at maximum lift. As a generalization valve springs for the 351C are sourced from valve springs designed for the big block Chevy. However, be aware that the installed height of a 351C valve spring is shorter (1.82”) than the installed height of a BBC spring. Shortening the installed height of a valve spring increases the seated force and shortens the spring’s maximum lift spec. The maximum lift should not exceed the valve spring’s “coil bind height” + 0.100”. The installed height of a spring can be increased by fly-cutting the spring seats or by installing valves with 0.100” longer stems. Longer valves impact rocker arm geometry however (as do higher lift camshafts).

I've been working on the following flat tappet valve spring chart, but its incomplete. The info in red has not been verified, and there is one blank field too.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • FT_valve_springs
You make no mention of your application (street or racing) or any of the engine parameters. For instance what's the stroke? This makes it difficult to comment on the camshaft.

Although its rated at 294 degrees duration, that's measured at 0.015", the standard for rating the duration of a solid tappet camshaft however is 0.020". Therefore the cam looks a bit bigger than it really is when compared to other cams. However based on the lash specification the cam will begin lifting the valves at 0.013", so the advertised valve events aren't too far off.

Based on the advertised valve events the cam's overlap is 74 degrees. I do not recommend anything greater than 60 degrees overlap for a street engine. Peak horsepower shall occur at about 4000 FPM mean piston speed, which with a 3.500 crank is equivalent to 6850 RPM.

The net valve lift is 0.585" which is compatible with the Crane spring.

Net Lift = (0.351 lobe lift x 1.73 rocker ratio) - 0.022" lash
For your described application I would suggest a solid tappet camshaft similar to this:

274°/288° duration @ 0.020 (advertised)
113°/116° lobe centerlines
238°/252° duration @ 0.050
36° Major Intensity
52° overlap
114.5° LSA

Such a cam will make peak BHP at approximately 3500 FPM mean piston speed, which is equivalent to 6000 rpm with a 3.500" stroke crankshaft. This complements the 4V cylinder heads. It will still rev as high as is "prudent" with an engine equipped with the factory connecting rods (~7000 rpm); but it will behave much better at lower rpm for street operation ... and with the Webers.

Food for thought.
George, what do you think ? Should I buy a new cam ? The Problem is : I can only buy from Summit. I can not buy from to much diffrent stores, beccause of the tax and shipping costs.
I have to pay about 20 USD per packet only for custom clereance+ tax . Also the freight costs are verry high from smaler suppliers.

So I would like to buy , what summit have.

The next problem is: I can not balance the crank , because nobody have masterweights for the V8 crank:-( What do you think is the max RPM for a stock Engine with ARP nuts ?

Do you know a good harmonic balancer for external balancing ?
Ital Ford, no the engine is balanced , because it is stock. We changend the bearings and the stock nuts.

but : when you change only the pistons , you do not need to balance the engine !
Only when you change the connecting rods you have to balance it. The piston is a part wich moves only up and down and do not have anything to do with the rotating parts.

George, thanks again.

All cams from Summit I found are between 108 and 110 LSA, when they have a higher lift.

Its realy difficult to find one... I will ask summit , if they have parts wich where not listed in their online catoalog...
Crower #15388 is similar to the Windsor cam above, but it is for the 351C.

About 61° overlap, 112° LSA.

The advertised lift is 0.524/0.533
The "net" lift is 0.502/0.509

Obviously we can do better in terms of valve lift if we do a custom cam.




The best Crane cam I found was #521131, the valve lift was better. It had about 60° overlap, but 108° LSA. The exhaust valve opened too late, the intake valve closed too early. Altering the cam timing to improve one aspect only makes the other worse.



The cam grinders are capable of producing better work, but the marketplace, magazines, SEMA, don't demand it from them. Their bottom line is to manufacture and market what sells, and what is competitive with the other cam grinders.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×