Skip to main content

Hey Folks:

As the title suggests, looking for recommendations on a new cam for my '71 351c 4v motor. Would like to stick with hydraulic lifters, no roller cam!

Current engine config; Holley 750 DP, Performer intake, pertronix 3, etc.

The car is mostly driven in the canyons, not to much city driving... but have to get to canyons.

Let me know.

Best JC71
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

> Would like to stick with hydraulic lifters, no roller cam!

Hydraulic or solid lifter cams can be either hydraulic or roller.
We are currently dyno testing a hydraulic roller on the 351C dyno
project engine. I assume you mean you want to stick with a hydraulic
flat tappet cam. If so, are you aware of the wear problems with
flat tappet cam lobes and low ZDDP content oil?

> Current engine config; Holley 750 DP, Performer intake, pertronix 3, etc.

Do you have closed chamber heads and flat top pistons?

What exhaust are you running? We lost 50+ HP through the stock and
Euro GTS mufflers. Gained 10 HP and 10 ft-lbs back by gutting the
Euro GTS mufflers and replacing the baffles with a Y-pipe. We gained
all 50 HP by running 3" inlet/outlet Magnaflows.

> As the title suggests, looking for recommendations on a new cam for my
> '71 351c 4v motor. The car is mostly driven in the canyons, not too
> much city driving... but have to get to canyons.

Okay.

> You want a dual pattern cam, different on the intake and exhaust events.

I think it's a fairly minor effect. You trade some low RPM performance
for some peak power that doesn't drop off as quickly. If you run extended
duration, be aware that extra lift is of no benefit. On dual pattern cams,
we've actually picked up a few HP and ft-lbs of torque running a shorter
1.65:1 ratio rocker on the exhaust side and 1.73:1 on the intake. Granted,
it's not a big effect. Ideally, a 351C with 4V heads (2.19" intake valves
and good exhaust) wants a narrow lobe center (107 or 108 degrees, 108 is
available off-the-shelf, 107 is custom order). If you have a restrictive
exhaust (lik most Panteras), you may want to widen the lobe centers a couple
of degrees to 109 or 110. Crower has a few cams in there "390 Series" for
351C with dual pattern, shorter exhaust lift and 110 lobe centers that might
fit the bill:

P/N LSA advert 0.050" lift cubes low peak peak top
duration duration intake/exhaust rpm tq hp rpm
15173 110 280/287 219/225 0.530/0.524 351 2300 3800 5700 6300
400 2000 3500 5200 5700

15174 110 289/295 227/233 0.550/0.547 351 2400 3900 5900 6400
400 2100 3600 5500 6000

For your application, assuming restrictive exhaust, I'd recommend the 15174.
I'd only go with the 15173 if the compression were low. Also, check with
Bullet on their pricing. All of Bullet's cams are custom ground. For only
a few dollars more, a cam tailored to your specific engine can be ground.

On 351C-4V's, I personally prefer 108 lobe centers but few Panteras have
an exhaust efficient enough to really utilize the narrow lobe center cams.
From our dyno testing, there is more to gain in the exhaust than in
aftermarket heads or intake manifolds. If you have an efficient exhaust,
there are several 108 lobe center grinds from Lunati, Isky, Crower etc.
that will work well.

In the "Be the Camshaft Expert" article, David Vizard presented the results
of a lobe separation test:

http://www.bacomatic.org/galle..._comparison.jpg.html

Ideal LCA for that engine was 108 degrees. Narrowing to 105 degrees made
similar power but had noticeably worse idle and low speed characteristics.
Widening to 111 degrees lost power most everywhere. At low speed, lots of
overlap is bad as it hurts low end but overlap helps power as the RPM
increases. To a degree, you can offset overlap with static compression.
For most V8's with reasonable heads, the ability to raise low speed torque
with compression increase holds to around 285 to 290 degrees (at lash point)
of cam duration. After that, drop off is faster than an increase in
compression can recover. In another article ("Compression Comprehension")
about running up to 12:1 compression on pump gas, Vizard presented the
results of a compression test:

http://www.bacomatic.org/galle...peed_output.jpg.html

"When used in conjunction with a bigger cam, increased compression can
work wonders for the entire curve. When a 265-degree cam (gray curve)
was substituted for a 285-degree cam (blue curve), a substantial drop
in low-speed output was seen. Raising the CR from 9:1 to 12:1 recovered
almost all the lost low end and gave a further increase in top-end
output"

When used with the right amount of cam overlap, you can run closed chamber
heads and flat top pistons in a 351C and have an excellent street motor
that runs on pump gas. In a dual pattern cam, the Crower 15175, looks
good:

15175 108 298/303 236/241 0.574/0.567 351 2500 4000 6100 6500
400 2300 3800 5800 6300

In a single pattern, Isky has the Isky 280 Megacam (the 270 Mega would be
good for a lower compression engine):

Isky 270 Mega 221 deg @ 0.050" (270 deg advertised), 0.542" lift, 108 LSA
Isky 280 Mega 232 deg @ 0.050" (280 deg advertised), 0.565" lift, 108 LSA

Lunati also has a couple:

Lunati 07111 225 degrees @ 0.050" (275 advertised), 0.550" lift and 108 LSA
Lunati 07112 235 degrees @ 0.050" (285 advertised), 0.560" lift and 108 LSA

Dan Jones
Dan would be very appreciative if you could look over this cam I just purchased and please give my your thoughts. I have "Thick Skin" so if the "cam" "Stinks", let me know. I have closed chamber heads and free flowing headers and exhaust, specs as follows.
Int Exh
Adv Dur 276 290
Dur@.050 220 230
Value Lift.591 .588
Lobe Sep: 106.0
Rocker Arm Ratio 1.73F Scorpion Performance Inc
Cam Manufacturer Comp Cams part# 32-000-8 serial# D 1342-04
Thanks, Mark.
> I have closed chamber heads and free flowing headers and exhaust

What mufflers are you running?

> Comp Cams part# 32-000-8

That part number indicates the cam is a custom grind street roller grind
using an austemprered cast ductile iron cam core. It is a roller cam but
may be either a hydraulic roller or a street solid roller. From the short
duration, I'll assume it is a hydraulic roller but please verify that.
Be aware that the cam material is supposed to be compatible with cast iron
distributor gears. In the past, I would recommend either a Ford Motorsport
or Crane steel distibutor gear but with Crane's demise, those are no longer
available. Do not use a parts store iron gear. A friend Rockwell (B scale)
tested several distributor gears. A generic auto parts cast iron gear tested
at 70, a bronze gear at 90, and the stock Ford cast iron gear was 102. Note
the soft bronze gear was actually harder than the generic auto parts cast
iron gear. Mallory makes a distributor gear for their distributors that is
made specifically for "austempered ductile iron billets" and "proferal billet"
cams. You may want to look into that gear.

Do you have the cam card for that cam? I'd need it to figure the total
overlap. From what you've provided, I'd guess the overlap is around 64
degrees. That is less than the 68 degrees of overlap of the cam I'm
currently testing in the 351C dyno mule. That cam has specs of:

228/232 @ 0.050" lift (280/284 @ 0.006)
0.588"/0.588" lift
107 LSA

Our cam peaks at around 6000 RPM and holds the peak past 6500 RPM
with the Crane link bar lifters. Your cam has specs:

220/230 @ 0.050" lift (276/290 advertised)
0.591"/0.588"
106.0

will likely peak around 5500 RPM, perhaps a bit less. Figure it will
have a noticeable idle and start pulling well at 2500 RPM or so.
Depending upon your intake and carb, it may take some fine tuning (carb
and distributor) to smooth out below 2500 RPM. If I were re-designing
your cam, I'd increase the intake duration at the expense of the exhaust
duration and widen the LSA slightly to 107 or 108 which would (not
coincindentally) end up looking more like the cam I'm testing. Extended
exhaust duration adds overlap but the duration is better used for power
on the intake side. Extended exhaust duration is primarily a drag race
trick to keep the power from dropping off quickly after power peak.
Ideally, you want to use the minumum extra exhaust duration that keeps
your cam from dropping off at your shift point. Extended exhaust duration
can also hurt fuel economy and low RPM performance but your total duration
is still moderate so that may not be big deal in your case.

Be aware that Comp uses a reduced base circle on their 351C hydraulic
roller cams. If you are using the spider and dog bones to retain the
lifters (like the OEM 5.0L hardware), there can be clearance issues in
Cleveland blocks. It seems to be hit or miss. Some Cleveland blocks
can use the OEM style, others need the link bar lifters. One one 351C,
we were able to use the dog bones, ona another we could not. Apparently
the lifter bore height varies enough in production 351C blocks to make
some of them too short for the Ford lifters. The Crane link bar lifters
fixed the problem in the block with clearance issues. Crane is no longer
in business but the lifters are still in inventory last time I looked.
Also, Comp makes a link bar lifter now. We trial fit those on our
351C dyno engine but they would not work due to a different problem.
With our standard base circle cam, the oil feed hole on the lifter comes
out of the bore at max lift due to the chamfer at the top of the lifter
bore. The same lifters worked on a previous 351C engine but that engine
had a block that was machined differently (by Ford). Comp uses reduced
base circle cams so you should not run into the problem but check it
anyway. Also, Dennis at Reed Cams said that, as a rule, irregardless of
how much lift that a camshaft has, the lifters generally all stop in
approximately the same location at the top unless the base circle is
deliberately reduced which can cause problems at the other end of the
lifter bores.

If you go with the OEM Ford style lifters, Alex Denysenko at MoneyMaker
Racing (http://moneymakerracing.com/) can get you Sherman modified lifters
that can be worth 500 RPM.

Dan Jones
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×