Skip to main content

On August 21, the Alberta Boys went for a drive. Ted and his son Nick met me in Edmonton in their white GT5-S Amerisport, and we drove to the small resort town of Sylvan Lake. There we met and had lunch with Robert and Doug, both accompanied by their sons, and Erik. Ted had to head back home, but the rest of us turned west and aimed for Nordegg and the mountains. Eventually we reached the Icefields Parkway and turned south to Banff. From there it was a straight run East to Calgary. We racked up several hundred miles, and had a blast!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Temp_2
Last edited {1}
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Peter H:
All posted speed limits were obeyed to the letter.


Peter, my crack Photoshop forensics team has determined that you have made a false statement. Our analysis shows that the bug splatter trail is far in excess of that of a bug killed "at legal speeds" (see attached evidence photo, Exhibit "A").

I must, however commend you on keeping a safe distance while following your "posse". At least when one of them explodes in a fireball, you may be able to stop in enough time to avoid serious injury. Unless of course that wimpy 427 motor was only running on 4 cylinders and you just couldn't keep up with them. Big Grin

It sure would have been nice to be there with you guys. Looks like an awesome run!

Mark

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 723102062_temp_3.JPG
Counsel for the defence would point out that you have only proven the windshield impacted the bugs at extra-legal velocity. You have not proven that it was not the bugs which were travelling at extra-legal speeds rather than the windshield at the time of impact. Nor have you proven that the rest of the car was attached to the windshield when the impact occured.

The defence rests.
Clearly the defendant is basing his defence on flimsy, under-funded counsel. Perhaps if he spent more of his funds on proper legal counsel instead of "octane boost" he would realize the insufficiency of his argument.

Our "reference" bug (a dragonfly) is traveling at 36 mph, which is widely regarded as the upper limit of speed for airborne insects. Sufficient remains exist to verify its origin (should defence wish to validate our sample...). While Mr "H" can argue that the windshield was not attached to the vehicle, the prosecution will show that to be yet another false-hood, as his car is widely known to be "original" and "unaltered" (with the exception of the previously noted 4/8 cyl. engine).

Prosecution rests. Big Grin
As an expert witness for the defence, I can confirm that the prosecution is an East Coast resident and not aware of mountain air and wind patterns.

A complex mix of wind patterns in the mountains will result in a wall of high-speed air that can hit suddenly and with great force.

Officially known as a "derecho," Spanish for "straight ahead," these types of violent storm winds are relatively rare globally but common in the Rockies.

What makes a derecho different from a traditional thunderstorm is that the air within it interacts in such a way to create a low-pressure system just beneath the main clouds.

Buffetted by such high winds, insects can travel many times the speeds the prosecution claims.
Uhh! Sounds like a lot of hot air to me.


Besides I was following David and Carmin last week-end. I am sure they were reading 'miles' speedometers in kilometers zones. That's the last time I tell anyone local cops won't stop you at 118 in 100 zone.

Denis
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×