Barnfind Mangusta Video

ok, another found in the range of probably 8ma800 range (switches down, separated window switches, one piece seats)...even if the comments by the poster call it a late model because of the rectangular headlights...At least, it looks like the custom headlights were because someone liked that look, not because the bumped the front...

is there an established pattern to the window switches?  898 has separate switches...

MH

Yeah, M!ke, there were 4 different dashes, so this car falls between ~8ma810 and 8ma960

   -first the "2-in-1" light switches (both switches under the same bezel), using the 4-wire window motors. These changed to 2 switches side by side at about 8ma810.

- switches went from "down" to "up" at 8ma956.

- of course, AC in dash at 8ma1100.

So the 3 wire window motors and dual switches for ~250 of the Mangustas. Other dating cues;

  Door panels went from 1 piece to 2 pieces about 8ma700.

Seats went from 1 piece to 2 piece with 8ma798..(or actually, according to Provamo, that car actually had both (unless the ID of the car got confused on Provamo...)...Lee

it might be of value to create a list of production changes for posterity...

I knew about the other dash changes, but never knew if there was an actual change point from separate window switches to pairs...  or if it was a random thing like the solid wood steering wheels...  or the side A/C vents like 898 has...

I guess we'd need a list of anomalies also...

MH

I don’t think there is a specific cutoff.  Cars were not necessarily built in sequence. Dashes evolved. Seats changed thru the production. Some very early cars had 2 piece seats, as you know the same seats showed up on Panteras.  For sure early cars had the lower switches and mid- production got the lower dash A/C vents.  2 headlamps came around the 1060 mark. (From memory) there may have been a couple random as prototype earlier). Rear body gussets were late production improvements.  There are a few unique elements on very early cars and late production cars.

Just wanted to 2nd Denisc's point about variation in seats.  1-piece and 2-piece seem to be peppered into production at random intervals. No rhyme or reason, simply what was available at the time.

As for the 2 headlamp cars, I was surprised to hear from PIM that in recent decades they had converted some Geese from 4 lamp to 2. That is a tragedy in my opinion. 4 headlamp was the true design. My understanding is the pop-ups were only to meet road safety requirements.

"There are a few unique elements on very early cars"

I am still hoping to one day see a Goose from the first 10 (or was it 11?) which have the different rear grill. Vertical slots instead of metal mesh.

Also the late cars have what I think is the better parking brake handle. Floor mounted instead of pulling out from the dash.

I still think that Spider is my favorite car in the world... On deviation, I've gotten all this purely from looking at Provamo. As Dennis points out, we're pretty clear that car chassis were not linear, at least there were exceptions...And some variations were post-production--well, at least 8ma789 shows originally 2 pieces door pads, then one piece door panels with 2 piece seats,  then back to 2 piece door panels with one piece seats , then brand new leather...

  Denis, I remember you counted the number of 2 headlight cars (at 20-something), the first I see is 8ma902. Scifi, the only conversions I've heard about are back to 4 headlight...the mod to add the movable headlights is something anybody doing bodywork would rather avoid . So I have the rare 2 headlight option on my car, not the outdated 4 headlight...yeah, umm... Lee

I think I had 43 documented 2 headlamp cars.  So I would estimate 50 cars built in that configuration.  

...Pretty interesting, Denis--on Provamo as I see, the first headlight model was 8ma936 and the last 8MA1148...

I wasn't aware of the rear vertical slots on the early cars...  looks like 518 is the last with slots, and 520 first with rear mesh...

I'm still wondering why the prototype had backup lights, but they didn't make it  into production...

MH

M!ke, it just keeps getting weirder what a beautiful tapestry...The backup light is even more farfetched than the brake light---at least, the brake light had a place on Lotus using the same umbrella handle. But at least the switch placement for the reverse light on Pantera was on the ZF box--and the first Mangusta had no box, it (and as I hear, on GT40s) was open.

Also, see the rear of 8ma508.

...posted about the same time, a US model (2 headlight car) in the Netherlands...I think 8ma1098. Nico is a bit off to guess that the cars were dangerous and handling caused half of them to disappear..at least, there would piles of parts somewhere if this was true . Also interesting that he says they didn't sell well, when it seems the plan from the get-go was 400 cars. Lastly, he could call them "Miura taillights" instead of Fiat 850     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-lEA3ij0uU

Listed at 279,500 euro and listing 78k kilometers....just ignore the MPH speedo . Cool to see a car that has been driven so much...Lee

Headlights.

That car was modified but is not made better.There hasn't been anyone around that can outdo Giugiaro so far. The fact remains that the car was created by de Tomaso to be a racecar for the street, unknown by most.  There were many government regulations that were waived to allow the car into the USA, all seen on that mylar strip on top of the hydraulic bottle cover. The headlamps are four inches too low to meet the US specs, and the whole car is designed around their placement.. You can tell when you drive at night as road surface regulations are exaggerated, creating big shadows.

De Tomaso was given time to legalize the headlamps, bring them to a height of 24 inches from ground and to continue production so that the dual lamp system could be implemented. Obviously not great looking but probably a big improvement to the driving experience.

The back-up lamp on the prototype was a paper mock-up, not a real taillamp.

I doubt very much if the production goal was 400, that probably happened to switch the production line over to the Pantera.

The production variations were probably all caused by the fact that de Tomaso was a dealer and had trouble with suppliers.

Much of this is covered in;

>BELLA MANGUSTA,The Italian Art and Design of the De Tomaso Mangusta.

My car is currently in the national Corvette Museum as part of an exhibit featuring foreign cars with Corvette engines.

DICK RUZZIN

Dick, so amazing that your Goose is sitting there in Bowling Green!   I've been trying to find the copy I didn't buy, the June 1969 Road Test featured an article with Mort Sahl, who quoted the 400 number then---so interesting, seems to have been the plan from the beginning (even if having to complete them in Germany must have come later !)--Lee

The book is NOT a copy of the Road & Track article.

It is a book that i wrote about the creation of the Mangusta, 64 large color pictures and 7000 words.  It is on sale on the internet or at,

bellamangustadesign.com.

BELLA MANGUSTA, The Italian Art and Design of the De Tomaso Mangusta.

Stay safe.

DICK RUZZIN

Oh, Dick, we've been a 2 copy family of your book for a few years now .

The Mort Sahl interview was in a small British magazine, and however he had already heard the "400" number is curious--at least, that interview may be the first where a certain production number was quoted...

I'm curious also, who may know the chassis numbers for the famously owned cars--Muhammed Ali seems was 8ma718, but then Willie Mays and Jack Lalanne and rumors of Pete Rose...? Only 8ma594 is listed as lime Green and in the same era I'd expect for Mort Sahl's car...Lee

@dickruzzin posted:

There were many government regulations that were waived to allow the car into the USA, all seen on that mylar strip on top of the hydraulic bottle cover.

Can anyone post a picture of that? Trying to source or create a replacement. Thanks.

...there were a few versions (!) Hall reproduces one of them (the one with Alejandro's autograph)  http://hallpantera.com/cgi-bin...a-inc&item=22962 . Somewhere during/after that was a 2nd version in "shopping list" enumeration of the specific safety items.

the 3rd version, somewhere in the ~1969 (8MA936 is the first I see) the "exemption 69-6" sticker placed on the bulkhead glass (and on 8ma1046, also on the windshield).  I don't remember seeing a car after the 8ma1100 range that had any of these (esp, it seems the trend of the later cars were less about the US market around then, otherwise we'd see a lot more 2 headlight cars...lord knows how the factory managed the variations in piece-parts...Lee