Skip to main content

I'm thinking of trying to get this editorial published, but first want your comments. It's a rough draft, and may need some polish. I probably need to tone it down a little. I should make it more concise. If it could be heard in the right ears, maybe action could occur, and things could improve long term. Any ideas? Feel free to try and get it published in your own local newspaper if you want. Add your own ideas or delete some of mine and then send it to the editor for publishing in the Sunday paper if you think it may help get things sorted out. We have problem that keeps getting worse. Lets try and help by offering solutions.


Editorial - GAS SHORTAGE AND INFLATION PROBLEMS - Editorial

The gasoline shortage is ridiculous. The oil companies are creating an economic crisis by refusing to build more refineries. They do this to make their NYSE stock prices higher, and executives do this simply to increase their executive compensation. With 'shortages' came higher prices, and this inflates the price of gas, generating higher price per share earnings. Escalating the cost of per barrel pricing inflates the value of oil companies "in the ground" oil reserves, increasing the per share value of NYSE stock, and all for the purpose to increase the oil company executive's "performance bonuses." Greed at the executive level is causing an economic crisis. We certainly do not want a Depression. Inflation will most hurt retired people on fixed income and low income people, exactly like in the 1970s.

We've all been experiencing corporate fraud in recent years and in fact, throughout history in America, remember Standard Oil of Ohio? A Monopoly. Remember Enron?

We can fix this. Corporate profits at oil companies should be reinvested to expand refining capacity, or this inflationary trend will continue. Hurricane Katrina simply magnified the exposure to our vulnerability. Laws should be changed to encourage the development of refineries. Increased competition is desirable, and the oil companies are not competing for corporate profits, instead they are playing monopoly to generate more profit.

We can ban incentive bonuses for executives based on inflationary profits. We can sue for corporate fraud and antitrust. We can nationalize the oil companies as vital to U.S. economic and national security interests. We can expand competition to decrease prices, or we could regulate prices. We could limit corporate profits for oil companies by reclassifying them as Public Utilities. We could mandate reinvestment of cash flow into refinery expansion if they won't. We can regulate all of this if and when it becomes necessary.

We cannot allow monopoly and self interest of oil executives to cause an economic crisis. We can change this at the government level to make the system function properly again. Our legislators, our judiciary and our executive branches of government have to deal with this serious threat and problem now. Not later. Now. And we the people have the power to make our government do what we want. What ever it takes to solve this big problem is what we must make happen. Take action, develop this plan of action and execute it.

Intel competes and so does Walmart, and they expand and lower costs to make more profits. Why shouldn't all the oil companies like Shell or Exxon be required to compete? Is it because we allowed them to all merge and increase the ease of committing antitrust and agree to not expand production? Or is there less competition, less supply and vulnerability problems because we have discouraged competition by mandating 100 different "blend" specifications for gasoline in each and every state?

At the very least, Congress could set a Federal Gasoline Standard "Blend," and define it's chemical composition, and let anyone anywhere sell that one blend of gasoline in any state of the United States. That way, even Saudi Arabia could compete by shipping refined gasoline to the USA instead of crude oil. That may make global demand easier and more efficient to supply. Let any country or company anywhere compete for our business. It's baloney for state and local governments to set gasoline standards when it leads to less competition and narrowing the number of suppliers. In this way, our government is hurting us. All of us. Intel doesn't have to have a distinct and separate computer microprocessor for each computer in each state. It's not wise to make the oil suppliers refine separate blends of gasoline in each state. And the environmentalist who disagree, well they are simply outnumbered and it's majority rule, their goals are in competition with our survival, and we have been paying too high a price for the desires of the few for too long already, so step aside. I'm sure environmental groups have their own special interests and financial incentives, like their own investments and projects to protect. Everyone has self interests, but the rule is "majority rule" and the majority are being hurt by all this legal baloney right now. Increase competition, deregulate gasoline "blend" specifications to one standard for the USA. And push environmentalists or corporations out of the way if necessary.

This needs to get fixed, now. Let's pull out of "Panic Mode" and start "Thinking Clearly Mode" right now.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

At 8:16 AM, Mountain Standard Time, Saturday, September 3, 2005, I e-mailed the Governor of the State of New Mexico with the above "editorial" for my proposed National Energy Policy. It was e-mailed exactly as you read it. It was actually quite easy to do. A quick search on Google for "Governor State of New Mexico" in the search field got to several webpages, then my first selected webpage had e-mail contact information to go straight to the Governor's Office. Then I just simply left clicked on the text in my editorial and selected "copy" and then pasted the entire editorial text in the box for "comments" and "submitted" my e-mail comments to the Governor of the [my] State of New Mexico.

You can do the same for any State you live in. Yes, you have a say in the way our country is run and you can take action right now. Leadership is in place and can be contacted in the next five minutes, by you, right from your computer. You can have a say in government, and if you agree with the concepts in my editorial, I urge you to submit them to your Governor too. Maybe our elected leaders are really hunting for solutions, and would love to hear from you, especially to the extent you are not simply complaining, but offering solutions. If your sumission of the editorial is accepted and blessed, you could get a letter from your Governor, suitable for framing and hanging on your office or home wall. But there's a more important reason to act, and you are respectfully encouraged to do so. Exercise your power and act, simple as that. Please.

My next step is to contact my Congressional Representatives and forward the editorial. Then I'll trim it down to a more concise, "quick read" and submit it to the Albuquerque Journal, the major newspaper in New Mexico. I may also forward copies to CNN and other television and print media. This is a less direct method of influence, but supportive of explaining the how and why, and can generate support from the voting population, to motivate our government to take action.

The ball is rolling, and I have an opinion and I'm going to do what I can to try and influence the outcome of this major issue. Please put on your thinking cap and be part of the solutin. Your opinion can count too. You don't have to be one of the silent huddled masses waiting to see what will happen next, you can try and inflence YOUR government. I respectfully encourage you to do so, whether you agree with my editorial "solutions" or have differing "solutions" it is important for you to take action. Or you can choose not too....

Respectfully submitted for your consideration,
Ronald C. Norman
Ron (future honorable RC Norman)

I like your idea of a national gasoline formula, with the idea being that it would attract competition and possibly the competitive market would drive prices down. I think this measure would be more palatable to the oil companies than national policy that regulates how the oil companies spend their profits.

I for one believe that any industry that supports our nation's infra structure should not be operated unregulated by the private sector. Human nature and corporate greed being what they are, maintenance is often neglected as a means to shave costs and improve the financial ledgers. Rising prices have advantages for Wall Street brokers and investors as well. Whats best for the nation is not a consideration.

Perhaps you are giving voice to the angst felt by millions, perhaps your e-mail is not alone, there may be millions of people expressing similar dissatisfaction to their elected officials.

Just watch out for the turtle soup! Wink

Your amigo, George
Ron, you're seeing the problem with so many "formulations" of gasoline played out before your eyes in this crisis. Thankfully, these restrictions were lifted so that the existing supplies can flow to where they are needed. The petroleum industry has long argued that short term, isolated shortages come from not being allowed ship existing gasoline where it is needed...when it is needed. Seems reasonable that a single formulation would make sense.
Without environmental regulation, no corporation, looking at bottom line profits, would do anything "clean". Costs too much. Makes you less competitive. So environmental regulation is necessary. But how much is enough? There will be no end to the "improvements" if we don't put our foot down and say "enough for now." Politicians need to stop fearing special interest groups on both sides and start being rational.
This leads me to the refinery problem. Oilmen will tell you there is not and has not been a supply problem. World demand is rising a faster than supply which results in a steadily rising price (normal supply-and-demand), but that the recent spikes in per barrel cost has been driven by oil traders (speculators) not market forces. Now, in the middle of this speculation runup, Katrina has smashed refineries and pipelines. The refinery problem has accelerated.
Refineries are smelly, dirty, and no one wants them in their backyard. Combine property interests with environmental interests and you pretty much have an insurmountable wall of resistance. We need to demand that the approval process for construction of new refineries be streamlined. Some people are going to be unhappy. Tough. Yeah...Tough. Fairly compensate those effected and move on.
We need more refineries...one formulation of gasoline...and "reasonable" environmental restrictions.
Only a wealthy, educated, responsible nation has the luxury of environmental concerns. The Communist and second/third world nations are not encumbered with such guilt.
It is time to back up a little and get on track again. We elected them...show us leadership...or show them the door.
Mooso.
You all make some great points. We definitely need to become more self sufficient in taking care of our own energy needs.

However, we need to put more resources into developing alternate means of fuel and propulsion. It's unfortunate that the biggest technological 'pushes' almost always occur during times of war. I'm not talking about regional conflicts (like Iraq), but full blown, the world is focused on nothing else, war (WWI=flight, WWII=jets/rockets).

This current oil crisis has the potential to crush our nation's economy! My friends, family, and neighbors are all talking about how much less they are, and will be spending on other things. Couple this with significantly rising property taxes (with a cut in services), and you've got a one-two combo that will have devastating affects. The middle class in America is going the way of the dinosaur!

For my engine rebuild (in the next year or two), I was considering a big cubic inch, fire breathing Windsor based motor. I've made up my mind. It will be a small displacement twin turbo motor. Turbo motors get great fuel economy under cruising conditions! Of course, this all depends if I can justify the cost of building another motor when I don't have to. I have to eat, you know.

Michael
We have the means of several alternative fuel/energy. Weather it be Hydrogen or alcohol from vegetation, or other. The main limitation is cost. While we have the technology we don't have the infustructure. The higher the gas cost is the more people will work to make these alternate fuels viable. The oil companies are shooting themselfs in the foot. The ultimate gratification would be to see us start growing our own fuel and make it work. Wouldn't that put a serious dent in the budget deffecit?

Gary
Interesting points.

As was pointed out, most technological leaps take place in times of crisis, usually wars. While gas was at $1/gallon there wasn't much interest in even talking about alternative fuels, since any shortage would obviously take place in the future and wasn't important *today*.

Perhaps this price shock is exactly what was needed to get people to take alternative fuels seriously, so perhaps there is a golden lining?

As one of the token Europeans on the board (or at least one living here) I remind people that fuel prices over here have been considerably higher than what you are paying now and it hasn't meant the death of European industry. Nor has it meant the death of the internal combustion engine. It has simply meant a few things - an adjustment of budget to compensate for $5/gallon fuel, a little more thought to engine type and size, and considering other forms of transportation that are not common or popular in the US.

In the US I don't remember the last time I rode in the back seat of a car... If a group of friends was going someplace, we would each take our own cars, or perhaps go 2/car at the most. It would be inconceivable to pile 5 adults into a car for a 2-hour trip... but I've done that a number of times since living over here.

50% of the cars registered in France are diesel. Over here, anything over 2.0 liters or 2.5 liter displacement is considered pretty big. Seriously. Most luxury cars are V-6's at most, and it isn't until the upper options and top models that you get into V-8s. Even most Mercedes are diesel.

Anyway it'll be interesting to see what happens as a result of the crisis, and whether it will be attacked from the supply or demand end...
Charlie,

I see your point about the high prices in Europe not killing industry and such. I think the biggest part of the problem here is that prices skyrocketed overnight (and that's the way it happened). It leaves people no time to adjust.

The European way of life is different from the American. This crisis will definitely incite change. Smaller cars, fuel effiency, and more resources being committed to the bottlenecks of alternative fuel sources will hopefully become more acute focal points.

Michael
quote:
Originally posted by Charlie McCall:
Perhaps this price shock is exactly what was needed to get people to take alternative fuels seriously, so perhaps there is a golden lining?


I think people do take it seriously but it is something that can't change over night. The hype created by the news will help. News seems to be a "bandwagon" and everyone seems to get on the issues they exploit.

None the less it is a good time and needs to be done. Right now USA uses about 20 mil bar oil per day. Europe uses about 15. Japan and China are both around 5 mill bar per day. That's a lot for Japan but a spoonfull for china. The prediction is by 2020 China will be using HALF of the WORLDS supply of oil!

People have talked about USA's increase dependancy on oil. If you look at the figures it has floated between 18-21 mil bar per day for the last 20 years! With China's groth that will really put a monkey wrench in the status quo. I am sure it will stress relations world wid which won't help anything either.

Now is a good time to...not come up with solutions. That we have...Implement solutions. We have the technology, just not the infustructure which will take keen intrest from people and industry.

Gary
Maybe the overnight increase is a good thing if you want something to stimulate creativity in finding solutions.

I don't smoke, but compare it to cigarettes. If the price slowly climbs up a few cents a year you get a little bit angry every year but not angry enough to actually quit. But if the price doubled from one day to another, perhaps you might just be angry enough to kick the habit.

Not sure exactly how that relates to the price of tea in China or the price of Super-Unleaded in Kansas, but there are parallels. No doubt the economy will take a one-time hit as unexpected expenses will have a negative impact on profits. But prices and the economy in general will reach a new equilibrum.

Personally, I'll be curious to see what the profit statements look like at the end of this year at the major oil producers. I understand that you are not exaggerating about prices skyrocketing from one day to the next, and outside of the damaged areas I don't see how supply or demand could have shifted that dramatically in 24 hrs...
Guys,

I was disappointed when the US did not take the opportunity to make the switch to alcohol in the '70s. The public would have embraced it back then. Its a clean burning fuel made from a renewable resource & it would have been a big boost for American agriculture, which was hurting, even back then. An unforseen benefit, the Arab countries would not be so rich as they are today. And America would be significantly more independent in regards to energy resources.

The reason we didn't convert to alcohol is because the oil industry has a full nelson on American politics. Idiotic thing is that somebody would have had to refine, transport & dispense the alcohol, the oil companies would have been best suited for the task. But people, even oil executives, are afraid of change.

One last observation; if you want to understand why prices are escalating, look no further than Wall Street. When the price of commodities go up on Wall Street, people get rich.

your energy dependent friend on the PIBB, George
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×