Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Joe…. Nice write-up!  You do good work!

Most comprehensive I’ve ever seen.

I would say the use of some of emissions equipment depends on whether you are running the Motorcraft 4300D carburetor, which 95%+ of USA cars are not.

Some of the other equipment depends on your distributor and air cleaner housing…

Rocky

Last edited by rocky

Bonjour Willy,

Sur la photo du haut (tuyau au dessus de la pompe à eau), il s'agit de la vanne EPVS et sur la photo du bas (pompe à eau), il s'agit de vanne EGR. J'ai joint 2 images des branchements des ces 2 vannes (fonction des n° de châssis). La vanne EPVS réduit l'avance à l'allumage, de quelques degrés, quand le moteur est trop chaud.

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 7120vacuum20B
  • vacuum208

Dear enthusiast
Attached are the photos with the reference of my carburettor currently setup on my Lady. I think it corresponds to F4 4300D so not good! What do you advise me knowing that I don't want to make it a racing car but with character despite everything, so can I simplify the system by changing the carburettor? if so which carburetor to buy? If I change the carburettor what will be the consequences? Or I keep my current carburettor, but what will be the constraints? My engine is original chassis THPNNE06974
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_20230810_155246

If you change your carburetor from the original one to a Holley etc, you will need to get a new intake manifold, or an adaptor with ovalised venturis to allow the new carb to fit and operate. If you change the intake manifold and want to maintain the original look, I suggest you get an aluminum one from Scott Cook in Australia (ask for the one that suits Panteras as it has a different angle on the flange that the carb bolts on to than for Falcons and Mustangs etc) and paint it the right colour blue. It will then appear to be an original intake manifold, complete with Ford symbols and part number cast in. The original air cleaner should also just fit under the original engine cover even with the 1-2 cm spacer that you will need to lift the aircleaner up to clear the fuel level adjustment screw/bolts on the top of the new carburetor - from your chassis number you should have the later raised centre engine cover. It will be worth all the hassle.

Cheers, Tim.

Pascal Tim, a mechanic in France advised me to replace a HOLLEY 4165 650cmf, what do you think of this solution, it's a good carb? What would that entail? gold has HOLLEY 4150 650cmf but he did not tell me that the modifications mentioned by Tim had to be made. carburettor to fit and work? do I also have to change the intake manifold if I choose one of these 2 carburettors?
If so, do you have any references for me? With pictures if possible!

THANKS willy

The Holley 4165 650CFM should be fine, but will also have the same problems with the intake manifold. Your intake manifold should look just like one in the picture below if it is the original one. It has an aluminium thing on top for the EGR valve, which you wont need if you get rid of all the polution gear. But you can clearly see the shape and size of the ports, which are the same in the manifold itself. This is what is called a spread bore manifold for a spread bore carburetor. If you compare with how a Holley carb looks from the bottom, you see the problem immediately, it is a so-called square bore carb. The Holley carb wont be able to open as the throttle plates and the holes in your manifold don't line up. A cheaper solution than new intake manifold etc, is a quite thick aluminium spacer which is totally open, or has  ovalised holes to allow the throttle plates to open. I have seen one of these ovalised adapters on a Longchamp, not sure if that is how De Tomaso did it at the factory.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DSC00247
Last edited by timsteren

Here is a short thread on the Scott Cook manifold:  https://pantera.infopop.cc/top...lane-intake-manifold

You can see where the carb bolts on and the width of the holes and spacing to allow the square bore carb to operate (strictly speaking the holes only need to be round, not large elongations as you see in the thread). If you do go down the road of the Scott Cook intake, then just be aware that I think it only comes with so-called 3V ports (I am not sure if it also comes with 4V ports) on the head side. These are revised ports with optomised flow compared to the original manifold and other manifolds of the era and are slightly smaller than the 4V ports in your head. The reason for this is that ideally they can be combined with Scotts 3V style heads (made to appear identical to the original Ford heads), better cam etc to give vastly superior performance, but an engine that looks completely stock standard and original. The 3V ports will bolt up fine to your head and should give better torque and low to middle range performance due to the better airflow. I have the Scott Cook manifold on my Pantera with a standard iron head with 4V ports and I haven't had any problems. If you are dead set on having 4V ports on your intake manifold then I would suggest the Blue Thunder intake, as others have suggested here.

Cheers, Tim.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×