Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm with you Gary, what a frivolous lawsuit, for an unproven condition. The Sierra Club has a history of this.

A greenhouse effect, if indeed there is one, shall help plant life fluorish, improve crops, etc. A savy Automaker should reply by sending California a bill for improving crops and plant growth around the state.

I am informed by the greenhouse people that the polar caps will melt and the level of the oceans shall rise.

Okay.

I'm waiting for the level of the oceans to rise. Until they do, I guess, by their own benchmark, the greenhouse effect must not be occuring.

cowboy from hell
In this case, it's a good tool for the Gov't to negotiate concessions with the auto industry for its planned emissions regulations.

As anyone who has every had to deal with Gov't knows, these guys are the most clued out and wasteful folks we could possibly have looking after the incredible sums of money that we empower them with.


Unfortunately, the citizens who are the most active in suing the Gov't back, are those in prison. I guess you need a lot of time and focus to go after our elected officials.
The website I posted is one of several which make a good argument. The argument that the air can not hold enough latten heat to heat the water as claimed and that the heat most likely comes form a cyclic core shift within the earth which is why we have a sudden spike every 1000+/- years.

True or not scientific theories are always best guess till more information is found. To think NHRA is banning high co2 fire extinguishers pisses me off; like everyone discharges them all the time for fun.

The link also holds some other pretty interesting things such as who Einstein really got his theory of relativity from and why it's not correct.

Good dinner party conversation.
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×