Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

> Hope all is well. The casting number indicates the heads are the "B351" heads.

Yes, those are B351's. The high port canted valve aluminum heads included
three basic designs: the A3, B351, and C302. The A3 was the earliest
of this family of heads. They were basically an aluminum evolution of
the Pro Stock high ported iron 4V's. Back in the '70's, when 351C's
were campaigned in the Pro Stock drag class, it was standard practive
to cut off the exhaust ports of iron 4V Boss 351 heads and bolt on an
aluminum plate that had a raised exhaust port location. Some racers also
filled in the bottom 1/3 or so of the intake port with epoxy or aluminum
port stuffers. The A3 is basically an improved aluminum version of a
Pro Stock high ported 4V head. The intake port is the same width as
an iron 4V (and is in the same location) but the lower portion is filled
in. The exhaust ports are circular in cross section and radically
raised compared to a 4V exhaust port so custom headers are required
(available off-the-shelf for Panteras). The A3's have the largest ports
of the lot (241 cc intake and 134 cc exhaust) and were optimized for 355
cid and larger engines used in drag and circle track racing. The B351's
came on the scene next. They had smaller 223 cc intake and 106 cc exhaust
ports and were optimized for NASCAR 355's. The C302's were the final
version of these heads and had the the smallest ports (212 cc intake and
95 cc exhaust, optimized for 320 cid and under Trans Am engines). They
were also designed to permit (require) custom porting for larger displacement
applications.

Since this family of heads was originally based upon iron 4V heads, they
are compatible with Boss 302, Boss 351, and 351 SVO valvetrain components
and pistons. Except for the intake and exhaust manifold differences
that are required by the port location and shape differences, these heads
were designed to be 1-for-1 replacements for Boss 351 cylinder heads.
They use a Cleveland style quench chamber and standard 302 Boss/351
Boss/351C/351 SVO valve train parts (will accept 2.19"/1.71" valves).
They have cast iron seats and guides (titanium valve compatible) and are
set up for studs and guide plates. They are also cast with combustion
face and front and rear coolant outlets to allow use on Windsor, Cleveland,
and SVO blocks. Pipe plugs are provided to seal the threaded openings as
required. The fact that they are basically bolt-ons, unlike the Yates,
makes them very desirable heads, particularly for applications like Panteras
where off-the-shelf headers exist.

The earliest versions of these heads went by a "Phase" designation and
were originally referred to as Phase 1 (A3), Phase 1 3/4 (B351), and Phase
III (C302, D302) heads. I also have a set of A3 heads that are Phase 1 1/2
that have intake ports that are narrower (look more like the B351 ports)
than other A3 heads. The exhaust side appears to be standard A3.
Apparently, these variations are not unusual as there were various versions
of these heads cast for specific applications and race teams. There were
also minor variations of the these heads. For instance, the D302 was an
unmachined version of the C302.

Roush and Edelbrock cast a variety of aluminum single plane race intakes
for the early high port heads.

Some other notes:

1. The M-6049-A3 head has the largest intake port volume (241 cc's)
and exhaust port volume (134 cc's), intake flows 280 cfm @ 25 in Hg
as cast, doesn't respond to rpm transitions as well as B351 or C302,
has slight bend on intake port wall to accomodate pushrods, raised
floor increases port radius, straightening the turn for incoming
mixture and minimizing fuel separation, optimized for 355 and larger,
drag racing, circle track, etc.

2. The M-6049-B351 has intermediate port volumes (223 cc's intake,
106 cc's exhaust, flows 260 cfm @ 25 in Hg as cast, intake port
wall filled around pushrod area to straighten it, intake floor same
as A3, material added to exhaust port floor increasing radius for
flow, optimized for NASCAR.

3. The M-6049-C302 has the smallest port volumes (212 cc's intake,
95 cc's exhaust), at the radius the intake port floor has been
filled about 0.120" which forms a slight hump to lift incoming
mixture and drop it evenly around the valve, like B351 wall filled
around pushrod to ensure straightness, optimized for Trans Am 320
cubes and under, narrow ports for increased velocity.

4. B versions (M-6049-C302B, M-6049-D302B) were revised for durability
but not approved by NASCAR, advertised as "too hot for NASCAR" by
SVO, extra material in rocker pedestal area and at spring seats,
rocker cover raised 0.2", improved heat treat, shoulder added to end
plug for improved sealing, outer bolt boss height raised to provide
common head bolt length.

5. All versions are fully compatible with 302 Boss/351 Boss/351 SVO
valve train parts (will accept 2.19"/1.71" valves) and have cast
iron seats and guides (titanium valve compatible), rocker stud
pedestals are machined flat and holes are tapped for threaded studs
and guide plates.

6. Uses Motorcraft AG-series spark plug (14 mm, 3/4 inch reach) with
gasket.

7. Head is cast with combustion face and front and rear coolant outlets
to allow use on 351W and 351C blocks. Pipe plugs are provided to
seal openings as needed. On Clevelands, install pipe plug in holes
on end of heads.

8. Originally referred to as Phase 1, 1 1/2, 1 3/4, and III heads.

9. Brodix has recently introduced a bolt-on replacement for the C302B head.

10. Nominal combustion chamber volume for the high port heads is usually
listed at 62 cc's, though Ford Motorsport sometimes lists 65 cc's.

11. Special versions of these heads were made for certain race teams.
I have a set of narrow intake port A3's, for instance.

Other stuff you may or may not know about, high port heads require one inch
longer head bolts/studs (use hardened washers). A3's, B351's, and early
versions of the C302 heads had one short bolt. Later C302B's got common
length bolts. The high port heads come with combustion face and front and
rear coolant outlets which get plugged with aluminum pipe plugs as needed.
Where the plugs go is a function of the block, whether or not the intake
has a coolant cross-over, and whether or not you run a remote coolant cross
-over. For instance, if you put high port heads on a Windsor style block
with a coolant cross-over manifold, the plugs go in the ends and the
combustion face and a 0.8" hole is drilled at the coolant cross-over.
The supplied instructions illustrate the options. Use a thread sealer and
make sure the plug is below or level with the deck surface. On Cleveland
blocks, pipe plugs go in the holes on the ends of the heads (coolant goes
from block to head, intake is dry). Also an external (not in manifold)
coolant crossover can be used (M-85920A351) to take water out the front of
the heads.

> Are these cosidered a good head as well?

"Beevis, there's no such thing as bad head"

Dan Jones
> Dan since you have a set of ported C3's, do you know what the cc's were on
> the intakes and exhausts as you are now running?

Intake port volumes are 217 cc's and exhaust port volumes are 112 cc's.
Mine are ported but are by no means hogged out. At the manifold face,
the intake ports measure 2 1/4" tall by 1 3/8" wide and the exhausts
measure 1 5/8" by 1 1/2" (D port flat bottom with circular roof).
Valves are 2.19" diameter intake and 1.65" diameter exhaust. Relative
to the valve diameter, the heads have a small minimum throat area with
tulip valves on the exhaust side. My C302's have a little larger exhaust
and flow a bit more on the exhaust side (242 CFM versus 230 CFM) but a
bit less on the intake side (318 CFM versus 331 CFM). In my simulations,
there wasn't a whole lot of difference between the two heads. I have
another set of C302B's which look good but haven't had a chance to put
them on the bench yet.

Dan Jones
> So your smaller port C3's outflow the larger port B and A's Dan?

My A3's were 327/234, the C302B's were 331/230, and the C302's
were 318/242 CFM. All were tested on the same bench, same day, and
same test conditions. I sold the B351's before I got a chance to
test them but the guy I bought them said they were 320+ CFM on the
intake side. The A3's were essentially unported, having only a
cartridge roll clean up. The C302's and C302B's were both ported
but by no means maxxed out. With a good bowl blending and valve
job, the A3's should do much better. I've seen numbers in the 360+
CFM range for both A3's and C302B's and a local Pantera owner has
a set of C302B's that supposedly pull 350 CFM. In my Dynomation
simulations, the C302B's were best but only a few HP separated
them from the C302's and the unported C302B's. I also ran the same
simulations using Kelly Coffield's Brodix BF300 flow numbers and
dimensional info, as well as the flow data for a set of 218 cc CHI
3V's. Kelly's heads were essentially unported and fitted with
smaller 2.135" intake valves but pulled 325/213 CFM (243 with a
pipe on the exhaust side). However, if you compare his numbers to
my C302B numbers, the unported BF300 heads took 0.1" more lift to
reach similar flow values so the area under the curve is less.
The same situation held for the CHI 3V heads (my C302B's flowed
more at 0.6" lift than the CHI 3V's at 0.7"). This was reflected
in the Dynomation power predictions as both the CHI 3V and unported
Brodix BF300 were down 35-50 HP. Understand this is an apples to
oranges comparison since all the heads had differing levels of
preparation, some were tested on different benches under different
conditions and the simulation can't account for differing chamber
designs (swirl/tumble, etc.). Kelly has had his engine on the dyno.
I should try to get all the particulars and see how well Dynomation
replicates the results. We got a pretty good match for my
buddies 556 HP 418W.

Dan Jones
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel_Jones:


The A3 is basically an improved aluminum version of a
Pro Stock high ported 4V head.

Dan Jones


I read a quote by "Dyno" Don Nickleson about the A3 heads. I think it was around the time he had the BB with the Motorsport aluminum 429 CJ head engine.
It was kinda of a negative one in that he said he got more HP out of the iron "high port" race heads then the A3's are capable of.

I always thought they were more "trans-Am" heads.

See, and I'm critacised for being harsh.
Gas velocity is a factor Doug. It helps the gas column flow around the valve head, and it keeps the gas column flowing into the cylinder longer after bottom dead center, when the piston starts moving upward, so the cylinder is filled with a little bit more air & fuel.

Port shape is also a factor. A straight length of 1" tubing flows better than an equal length of 1 1/2" tubing that has a 90 degree bend in it. Dan also mentioned the little hump in the floor of the C302 heads that lifts the column, I believe to direct the flow along the port roof.

your friend on the DTBB
> I read a quote by "Dyno" Don Nickleson about the A3 heads. I think it was
> around the time he had the BB with the Motorsport aluminum 429 CJ head
> engine. It was kinda of a negative one in that he said he got more HP out
> of the iron "high port" race heads then the A3's are capable of.

Do you have that quote? I'd really like to know the context and time
frame. Was it referring to the A3's or XE aluminum heads? Was it engine
power or flow bench numbers. If he was comparing a set of worked, iron
high ported 4V heads, to a set of out-of-the-box A3's then maybe but if
he was referring to equally prepared heads I do not buy it. I have a set
of iron high ported 351C Pro Stock type heads and there is nothing in those
heads that you couldn't do to a set of A3's. Plus the iron 4V's have several
undesirable area transitions.

> I always thought they were more "trans-Am" heads.

No, the C302's were the Trans Am heads. I've got a nice build up article on
a 310 cube Trans Am engine with C302B's.

> I don't get it. How does a head with a smaller valve, a smaller port volume
> flow more and make more HP with the same cubic inches? That's contradictory
> isn't it? Not only should the peak be lower but the area under the curve
> should be less as well for the same cubic inches?

The bowl work on the ported C302B's is a whole bunch better than my A3's.
Also, the shape of the ports is better. With some bowl work, the A3's
would likely outflow my C302B's but with somewhat lower velocity. With
all-out porting, the C302B's will likely outflow the A3's because they have
more material to permit custom porting shapes.

Dan Jones
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel_Jones:


Do you have that quote? I'd really like to know the context and time
frame.

Dan Jones


I believe that it was in a Super Ford, circa late 80's early 90's.

As I recall, he refered to horse power results rather then cylinder head flow.

It wasn't an indepth interview on cylinder heads. It was a response to a question the interviewer asked about if he was running Pro Stock today with the 351c, what did he think about the Motorsport parts available.

I don't save all of those mags. I would doubt that I still have it.

Also what is the signifigance of testing head flow at 28in-mg? At exactly what rpm does one achieve that pressure?
Last edited by panteradoug
> I believe that it was in a Super Ford, circa late 80's early 90's.

I recall reading it once upon a time and dismissing it but I don't recall
the details. I've still got all my Super Fords around here someplace...

> Also what is the signifigance of testing head flow at 28in-mg? At exactly
> what rpm does one achieve that pressure?

Inches-milligrams isn't a pressure measurement. Flow bench pressure drops
are usually expressed in inches of mercury (e.g. 10" Hg) or inches of water
(e.g 28" H2O) because those are the two most common substances used in the
manometers. 10 and 28 inches of water are the two most popular pressure
drops used on commercial flow benches like a SuperFlow 600. The 28" drop
takes a larger, more expensive pump, so many measurements are taken at 10"
and then converted analytically to 28". Those numbers are generally
optimistic (compared to actually testing at 28") because the character of
the flow can change at varying pressure drops. Neither value is meant to
replicate a specific RPM and both are well below the levels (upwards of
190" H2O) that may be seen in a running engine. There are other limitations,
of course. A flow bench maintains a steady pressure drop while a running
engine has unteady flow that also changes direction (reversion). Thermal
effects are ignored and intake ports are usually flowed without an intake
manifold and exhaust ports without headers. Also, dry air is usually flowed,
instead of fuel-air mixure. Some cylinder head development (AMC, I
believe) has even been done using benches that flow water, not air.

Dan Jones
> Sorry DAn, so I can't type. Soot me.

Sorry, didn't mean to offend.

> Turns out that I don't have a set of 351B's nor a set of C302B's, rather I
> have one of each !?! The heads don't match. Frowner

Have you checked to see if they have been match ported? You can port a C302B
to have the same port shape and volume as a B351. The engine won't know the
difference.

Dan Jones
Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×