Skip to main content

I believe I have TWM IR's on my car, which I believe use the same mountings as Webers for the stacks (2 screws). I believe they are 48 or 50mm.

Presently I have a short set that I use with an air cleaner setup, but I was thinking if I came across a set of 4" stacks for cheap enough, I might jump on a set for the occasional times I want to show off the injection.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I found that TWM was bought out by Borla. I will have to measure to find out if they have longer stacks available.

I also think I'll be switching to a crank-trigger ignition, with Electromotive ECU.

Price is right for the whole system, I can install it myself.

This will be in a few months.
How about 5"? Will those fit? Show me a picture of how your stacks mount to the throttle bodies.

These are the stacks for the Webers. They have no mounting flanges. They are held in place by mounting tabs.

http://vwparts.aircooled.net/T...-550-p/52840.550.htm

I found this picture of what you had previously posted.

The 48 IDA is a different mounting method then yours are which are like the Delorto carbs or the Weber IDF series.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • MTS_velocity_stacks
Last edited by panteradoug
quote:
Originally posted by 4NHOTROD:
Careful of the screens you use. My old ones cost me over 50hp.


The best screen mesh has a 46% flow rate. In other words you loose 54% of the flow, more or less. So you need a screen with about twice the surface area of the stack intake to compensate.

I have not seen any that are premade like that. You actually need to make your own.

There are a couple of vintage pictures of Indy and Can-Am cars with that kind of screen on the stacks. I can't say that I have saved any of them.

The hard ass race teams understood this and the concept of not sucking in something under full throttle so this idea is not new.

God gave us all a brain with high capacity and some with operational capabilities? If you need to fall back on anything, this would be a good time. Hopefully it won't give you a migraine?
Last edited by panteradoug
These are the 5" tall stacks for 48 IDA's. With the screens they fit under the roof with about 1" of clearance over the screens which are about 1-1/2" high.

You need to make your own screens for them. These are mine. These have a surface area 247% of what a flat screen would. That means there should be virtually no restriction to them. Less anyway.

These, the tall stacks, also help with the fuel reversion caused by a conventional non-"Weber specific" cam with a high overlap. The cloud stays more in the stack because of their greater than stock height.

The Pantera can run them. Other cars don't have the hood clearances for them.

These are spun aluminum. Really nice stuff.


Stainless screens and rings, a la Shoppe d'Doug. Don't like 'em? Don't look at 'em. Read it and weep. Wink

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 2015-07-16_07.46.13
Last edited by panteradoug
I'm kind of striking out finding tall aluminum velocity stacks for my setup.

I'd love to find some 5" aluminum stacks similar to the shorties I have, and then I could do Panteradoug's screen trick to that.

I might settle for the steel versions if I can find a set that fits.

I may have to find someone who can help me mod mine, weld a center section in place.
Send him the pic of your stacks. It might help him.


I don't know how the 51mm designation on yours effects the situation?

The picture I posted should fit yours. At least the bolt pattern will and the trumpets themselves appear to be the same ones that I have.

IF your intention is to attach the screens like I have then you do not want the rolled over edges on top. There is no "flange for the rubber ring to attach to like on mine.



You are going to have to do something with keeping water out of all of them but mostly on #4 and #8. Those two will be completely exposed since the roof does not cover them.

The others although they are open as well are tucked up under the roof.

You just have to wash the car from a garden hose carefully with those. It can't go into a carwash any more (as if it ever did).

The Pantera "sugar scoop" roof spoiler that came on th L's becomes functional with an IR induction system especially with tall ram stacks like this. It directs the air coming over the roof into the intake area of the stacks.



The taller stacks also change the frequency of the sound that the engine makes at full throttle. I suppose it is like playing a trombone which has a slide tube to change the notes it plays.


Someone had actually done a flow test on these things and said that the wider mouth opening increased the flow through each runner by 25cfm over the stock Weber stacks. It seems like a lot but there is logic to a reduction in restriction of flow.

I think it was one of the VW people but they don't use the tall stacks like this, just the wide mouth stacks.

How this effects a TB system, I don't know? You will find out.



On 48 IDA's you can change the "venturis" and that does effect the flow of the carburetor.

Stock, IDA-4's come with 37mm "chokes" (venturis). The Ford GT40's used 42mm ones and those carbs were designated as IDA-1.

This is all with 48mm throttle bores. Yours are using 51 mm throttle bores so those give the engine different characteristics in where the "torque curve" comes "in" as does the id of the header tubes and their lengths.

WEBER says the 48 IDA system with 37mm chokes flows 2400 cfm. 300cfm x2 x 4 carbs. That is 300cfm per intake throat. That is right around where you want them but is becoming restrictive right there.

42mm would be better putting the system right around 320-330cfm especially with a less restrictive "trumpet". Now you can see how changing these parts "tunes" the intake flow and power range of the engine?

This is also where the lift of the camshaft has to put the intake flow of your heads into the 300 to 330 cfm vicinity. That information is determined on the flow bench.

From what I have seen the lift of the cam needs to be .600 or more and lifts over about .630 no longer are adding any contribution to that flow. They are just adding unnecessary stress to the valve train? BUT even if they did, the induction is already at it's limit and maxed out. Wink

ALSO, I too am using that Hall Pantera intake manifold. Even though a 51mm throttle plate will flow more cfm, the manifold runners are at their limit somewhere right around there (as cast). The runners right under the flanges need to be worked in order to use the additional flow.

On mine, that flange was as delivered machined exactly at 48mm.

On yours, you would see that immediately when the TB's were off for the o-ring repair. You would see on the mounting flanges where there was work with a die grinder done AND the throttle plate opening in the intake flange enlarged to 51mm.

I have had BOTH of the Hall manifolds and there is a diffeence in the casting between the original 4v head manifold and the A3 "raised port" manifold. You want the "raised port" manifold. It has better line of sight to the intake valve but that only matters if your throttle plates open on the inside rather than the outside of the port. You gain throttle response opening on the outside.



If you noticed the rpms used in the youtube of the blue Pantera on the track, it never goes above 6700 rpm and rarely below about 4,000rpm. That is where that car is "tuned".

Simply put, you do not need an engine that turns over 7,000 rpm. As tuned it will even pull with a 427 which is what I said about driving a 427 Cobra and a Gp4 on the same day.

I actually thought the Pantera was faster. It certainly was dialed in better than the Cobra was.



With a Pantera with IRS, independent runner system induction, you are actually tuning the system to the car and the way the engine and induction fit into the body of the car. If you put this exact system into another body and chassis, you need to start all over again. It will not be the same solution and it will not give you the same results. Big Grin



OH! Almost forgot! There was an Aussie selling stacks to fit both setups on Ebay. His solution was to take a 48 IDA stack and make bolt on flanges that clamped the stack to whatever you were using. That made the stack a modular system by the adjustable bolt on clamps.

Trouble is I can't seem to find the guy now? I will search again later.
My engine I was told has C3L heads, and with the TWM injection manifolds, looking down the throats it looks as if everything has been matched.

The engine pulls WAY past 7000, but I really won't ever be revving it that high. I'm just happy to have it back up and running.

The taller stacks I want mainly for looks. I know their lengths affect the engine behavior, lots of engines have telescopic stacks to take advantage of this (Mazda, Ducati, KTM, all used, and presently use variable length velocity stacks).

IMO there's just nothing cooler than 8 tall stacks sticking up high like the ones in the video of the white Pantera.

I hope to run 5" stacks with the same screens and rubber attachment that Panteradoug has goin on.

Not worried about water. Car's on slicks, and will never see water or rain. Washing's done by hand and polish and spray bottles.
quote:

I hope to run 5" stacks with the same screens and rubber attachment that Panteradoug has goin on.



Big Grin



[/QUOTE]
Not worried about water. Car's on slicks, and will never see water or rain. Washing's done by hand and polish and spray bottles.[/QUOTE]



I try to prepare the car for the unexpected. Here in the east this time of the year it is not unusual to get sudden deluge out of no where.


Albert Hammond - "It never rains in California"


Also you have to look out for someone else's kid or maybe a girlfriend who wants to help out and surprise you...the car... with a surprise wash job. Wink


I wash my engine too. "it's a clean machine". Cool

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×